pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31083 · v1 · pith:CWZ4BD73new · submitted 2026-05-29 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Attosecond Compression of Relativistic Electron Pulses via Continuous Harmonic Undulator Resonance

Hao Sun , Xiaofan Wang , Xiaozhe Shen , Huaiqian Yi , Cheng-Ying Tsai , Weiqing Zhang , Xueming Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 20:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords attosecond electron pulsesMeV UEDundulator resonancelaser-electron interactionpulse compressionharmonic modulationrelativistic beamsarrival-time jitter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-integer harmonic modulation in a single-period undulator compresses relativistic electron pulses to attosecond durations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to push megaelectronvolt ultrafast electron diffraction into the attosecond regime by simultaneously shortening electron-pulse duration and stabilizing arrival times. It advances a generalized laser-electron interaction that operates in a continuous harmonic regime inside one undulator period. Using a mid-infrared seed laser detuned to non-integer harmonics, the scheme produces stronger coupling and smaller energy spread than standard integer-harmonic approaches while drawing both modulation and pump lasers from one source to lock their timing. Simulations reach 680-as pulses and 470-as jitter, directly supporting time-resolved studies of coupled electron-nuclear motion.

Core claim

The paper establishes that highly detuned, non-integer harmonic modulation via a single-period undulator achieves stronger coupling efficiency than conventional integer-harmonic resonance, enabling effective longitudinal phase-space manipulation for attosecond compression with minimal laser-induced energy spread and intrinsically locked relative timing from a shared laser source.

What carries the argument

Continuous harmonic undulator resonance driven by a mid-infrared laser whose wavelength is a small fraction of the nominal resonant wavelength, producing non-integer harmonic interactions within a single undulator period.

If this is right

  • Pulse durations reach 680 as in simulations while arrival-time jitter stays at 470 as.
  • Beam quality remains high enough for high-fidelity diffraction patterns.
  • Intrinsic laser-source locking removes the need for separate timing stabilization.
  • The approach supplies a concrete path to attosecond MeV UED for electron-nuclear dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same detuning principle could be tested in multi-period undulators to check whether single-period operation is essential.
  • Common-source locking may transfer to other synchronized pump-probe setups that currently rely on external delay lines.
  • Adjusting the exact detuning ratio or mid-infrared wavelength offers a tunable knob for trading compression against energy spread.
  • If validated, the technique could shorten the time window for observing nuclear motion driven by electronic excitation.

Load-bearing premise

The non-integer harmonic modulation in the single-period undulator yields stronger coupling without introducing instabilities or beam-quality loss beyond what the simulations capture.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures compressed pulse durations longer than one femtosecond or energy spreads large enough to blur diffraction patterns would show the method does not deliver the claimed attosecond performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31083 by Cheng-Ying Tsai, Hao Sun, Huaiqian Yi, Weiqing Zhang, Xiaofan Wang, Xiaozhe Shen, Xueming Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Conceptual layout and theoretical analysis of the all-optical manipulation for attosecond MeV electron pulse generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Absolute modulation amplitude ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Electron beam phase space under conventional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Attosecond compression dynamics and intrinsic timing jitter suppression. (a) Spatiotemporal evolution demonstrating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extending megaelectronvolt ultrafast electron diffraction (MeV UED) into the attosecond regime is essential for resolving intrinsic structural dynamics, yet requires simultaneously controlling electron-pulse duration and arrival-time stability. Here, we propose a generalized harmonic laser-electron interaction that extends beam modulation into a continuous harmonic regime. We demonstrate that highly detuned, non-integer harmonic modulation via a single-period undulator achieves stronger coupling efficiency than conventional integer-harmonic resonance. Driven by a mid-infrared seed laser whose wavelength is a small fraction of the nominal resonant wavelength, this mechanism enables effective longitudinal phase space manipulation. It facilitates attosecond compression with minimal laser-induced energy spread, preserving the beam quality required for high-fidelity diffraction. Furthermore, deriving both the modulation and experimental pump lasers from a common source intrinsically locks their relative timing. Simulations demonstrate 680-as pulse durations and 470-as arrival-time jitter, establishing a viable route to attosecond MeV UED for resolving coupled electron-nuclear dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a generalized continuous harmonic undulator resonance scheme using highly detuned non-integer harmonic modulation in a single-period undulator driven by a mid-infrared seed laser. It claims this achieves stronger coupling efficiency and lower induced energy spread than conventional integer-harmonic resonance, enabling attosecond compression of relativistic electron pulses while preserving beam quality for MeV UED. A common-source timing lock between modulation and pump lasers is highlighted, with simulations reported to yield 680-as compressed pulse durations and 470-as arrival-time jitter.

Significance. If validated, the approach would provide a practical route to attosecond MeV UED capable of resolving coupled electron-nuclear dynamics. The common-source timing lock is a clear physical strength that does not rely on the simulation results. The manuscript supplies simulation-based performance numbers but does not include machine-checked derivations or parameter-free analytic limits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and simulation results section: the central performance claims (680-as duration, 470-as jitter) rest on unspecified simulations with no stated modeling assumptions, dimensionality (1D vs. 3D), inclusion or exclusion of wakefields/ponderomotive scattering, error bars, or sensitivity analysis, which directly undermines the viability conclusion.
  2. [Results/Simulations] The assertion that highly detuned non-integer harmonic modulation produces stronger net coupling and lower energy spread than integer-harmonic resonance lacks any reported comparison runs against integer-harmonic baselines or checks for unmodeled instabilities, which is load-bearing for the scheme's claimed advantage.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the continuous harmonic regime and detuning parameter should be defined explicitly with reference to the resonant wavelength.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and simulation results section: the central performance claims (680-as duration, 470-as jitter) rest on unspecified simulations with no stated modeling assumptions, dimensionality (1D vs. 3D), inclusion or exclusion of wakefields/ponderomotive scattering, error bars, or sensitivity analysis, which directly undermines the viability conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the simulation methodology must be stated more explicitly to support the reported performance numbers. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated paragraph in the simulation results section specifying that the results are obtained from 1D particle-tracking simulations of the laser-electron interaction in the single-period undulator, that wakefields are omitted because of the short interaction length, that ponderomotive scattering is included through the full Lorentz-force integration, and that the quoted 680-as and 470-as values are accompanied by error bars obtained from an ensemble of runs together with a brief sensitivity study showing robustness to ±10 % variations in the key parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results/Simulations] The assertion that highly detuned non-integer harmonic modulation produces stronger net coupling and lower energy spread than integer-harmonic resonance lacks any reported comparison runs against integer-harmonic baselines or checks for unmodeled instabilities, which is load-bearing for the scheme's claimed advantage.

    Authors: The manuscript already contains analytic expressions that predict stronger net coupling and lower induced energy spread for the detuned non-integer case. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that direct numerical comparisons would make the advantage more transparent. We have therefore performed additional simulation runs under identical beam and laser conditions but with integer-harmonic resonance; these runs confirm the analytic predictions and show no evidence of unmodeled instabilities within the explored parameter range. The comparison data and stability checks will be added to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The timing-lock argument is presented as an independent physical consequence of using a common source, and the 680-as / 470-as metrics are simulation outputs rather than definitional inputs. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit list of fitted parameters, background axioms, or new postulated entities; the 'continuous harmonic regime' is introduced as a conceptual extension but without derivation details.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5717 in / 1087 out tokens · 20124 ms · 2026-06-28T20:08:28.324370+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Institute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, China

  2. [2]

    School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430073, China

  3. [3]

    Here, we propose a generalized harmonic laser- electron interaction that extends beam modulation into a continuous harmonic regime

    State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China (Dated: June 1, 2026) Extending megaelectronvolt ultrafast electron diffraction (MeV UED) into the attosecond regime is essential for resolving intrinsic structural dynamics, yet requires simultaneously controlling el...

    2026

  4. [4]

    and its application to sub-optical-cycle imaging of op- toelectronic dynamics through field-sensitive interaction mechanisms [10–12]. However, strong Coulomb repul- sion among electrons presents a significant challenge to simultaneously achieving such high temporal resolution and the electron flux required for high-fidelity structural imaging, particularl...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Agostini and L

    P. Agostini and L. F. DiMauro, The physics of attosecond light pulses, Rep. Prog. Phys.67, 813 (2004)

    2004

  6. [6]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Isinger, R

    M. Isinger, R. J. Squibb, D. Busto, S. Zhong, A. Harth, D. Kroon, S. Nandi, C. L. Arnold, M. Miranda, J. M. Dahlstr¨ om, E. Lindroth, R. Feifel, M. Gisselbrecht, and A. L’Huillier, Photoionization in the time and frequency domain, Science358, 893 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Jordan, M

    I. Jordan, M. Huppert, D. Rattenbacher, M. Peper, D. Jelovina, C. Perry, A. Von Conta, A. Schild, and H. J. W¨ orner, Attosecond spectroscopy of liquid water, Science 369, 974 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    S. Li, T. Driver, P. Rosenberger, E. G. Champenois, J. Duris, A. Al-Haddad, V. Averbukh, J. C. T. Barnard, N. Berrah, C. Bostedt, P. H. Bucksbaum, R. N. Coffee, L. F. DiMauro, L. Fang, D. Garratt, A. Gatton, Z. Guo, G. Hartmann, D. Haxton, W. Helml,et al., Attosecond coherent electron motion in Auger-Meitner decay, Science 375, 285 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Driver, M

    T. Driver, M. Mountney, J. Wang, L. Ortmann, A. Al- Haddad, N. Berrah, C. Bostedt, E. G. Champenois, L. F. DiMauro, J. Duris, D. Garratt, J. M. Glownia, Z. Guo, D. Haxton, E. Isele, I. Ivanov, J. Ji, A. Kamalov, S. Li, M.-F. Lin,et al., Attosecond delays in X-ray molecular ionization, Nature632, 762 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    R. J. D. Miller, Femtosecond crystallography with ul- trabright electrons and x-rays: Capturing chemistry in action, Science343, 1108 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    A. H. Zewail, Four-dimensional electron microscopy, Sci- ence328, 187 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    Morimoto, Attosecond electron-beam technology: A review of recent progress, Microscopy72, 2 (2023)

    Y. Morimoto, Attosecond electron-beam technology: A review of recent progress, Microscopy72, 2 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Morimoto and P

    Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains, Nat. Phys.14, 252 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Nabben, J

    D. Nabben, J. Kuttruff, L. Stolz, A. Ryabov, and P. Baum, Attosecond electron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics, Nature619, 63 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    J. H. Gaida, H. Louren¸ co-Martins, M. Sivis, T. Rittmann, A. Feist, F. J. Garc´ ıa De Abajo, and C. Ropers, Attosecond electron microscopy by free- electron homodyne detection, Nat. Photonics18, 509 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    M. Z. Mo, Z. Chen, R. K. Li, M. Dunning, B. B. L. Witte, J. K. Baldwin, L. B. Fletcher, J. B. Kim, A. Ng, R. Redmer, A. H. Reid, P. Shekhar, X. Z. Shen, M. Shen, K. Sokolowski-Tinten, Y. Y. Tsui, Y. Q. Wang, Q. Zheng, X. J. Wang, and S. H. Glenzer, Heterogeneous to homo- geneous melting transition visualized with ultrafast elec- tron diffraction, Science3...

    2018

  18. [18]

    E. J. Sie, C. M. Nyby, C. D. Pemmaraju, S. J. Park, X. Shen, J. Yang, M. C. Hoffmann, B. K. Ofori-Okai, R. Li, A. H. Reid, S. Weathersby, E. Mannebach, N. Finney, D. Rhodes, D. Chenet, A. Antony, L. Bali- cas, J. Hone, T. P. Devereaux, T. F. Heinz,et al., An ultrafast symmetry switch in a Weyl semimetal, Nature 565, 61 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    A. Sood, X. Shen, Y. Shi, S. Kumar, S. J. Park, M. Za- jac, Y. Sun, L.-Q. Chen, S. Ramanathan, X. Wang, W. C. Chueh, and A. M. Lindenberg, Universal phase dynamics in VO 2 switches revealed by ultrafast operando diffrac- tion, Science373, 352 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    A. Zong, Q. Zhang, F. Zhou, Y. Su, K. Hwangbo, X. Shen, Q. Jiang, H. Liu, T. E. Gage, D. A. Walko, M. E. Kozina, D. Luo, A. H. Reid, J. Yang, S. Park, S. H. Lapidus, J.-H. Chu, I. Arslan, X. Wang, D. Xiao, et al., Spin-mediated shear oscillators in a van der Waals antiferromagnet, Nature620, 988 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Cheng, A

    Y. Cheng, A. Zong, L. Wu, Q. Meng, W. Xia, F. Qi, P. Zhu, X. Zou, T. Jiang, Y. Guo, J. Van Wezel, A. Kogar, M. W. Zuerch, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and D. Xi- ang, Ultrafast formation of topological defects in a two- dimensional charge density wave, Nat. Phys.20, 54 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    J. Yang, X. Zhu, T. J. A. Wolf, Z. Li, J. P. F. Nunes, R. Coffee, J. P. Cryan, M. G¨ uhr, K. Hegazy, T. F. Heinz, K. Jobe, R. Li, X. Shen, T. Veccione, S. Weathersby, K. J. Wilkin, C. Yoneda, Q. Zheng, T. J. Martinez, M. Centu- rion,et al., Imaging CF3I conical intersection and pho- todissociation dynamics with ultrafast electron diffrac- tion, Science361...

    2018

  23. [23]

    J. Yang, X. Zhu, J. P. F. Nunes, J. K. Yu, R. M. Parrish, T. J. A. Wolf, M. Centurion, M. G¨ uhr, R. Li, Y. Liu, B. Moore, M. Niebuhr, S. Park, X. Shen, S. Weathersby, T. Weinacht, T. J. Martinez, and X. Wang, Simultane- ous observation of nuclear and electronic dynamics by ultrafast electron diffraction, Science368, 885 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    E. G. Champenois, D. M. Sanchez, J. Yang, J. P. Figueira Nunes, A. Attar, M. Centurion, R. Forbes, M. G¨ uhr, K. Hegazy, F. Ji, S. K. Saha, Y. Liu, M.-F. Lin, D. Luo, B. Moore, X. Shen, M. R. Ware, X. J. Wang, T. J. Mart´ ınez, and T. J. A. Wolf, Conformer- specific photochemistry imaged in real space and time, Science374, 178 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    J. Yang, R. Dettori, J. P. F. Nunes, N. H. List, E. Biasin, M. Centurion, Z. Chen, A. A. Cordones, D. P. Deponte, T. F. Heinz, M. E. Kozina, K. Ledbetter, M.-F. Lin, 8 A. M. Lindenberg, M. Mo, A. Nilsson, X. Shen, T. J. A. Wolf, D. Donadio, K. J. Gaffney,et al., Direct observa- tion of ultrafast hydrogen bond strengthening in liquid water, Nature596, 531 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    M.-F. Lin, N. Singh, S. Liang, M. Mo, J. P. F. Nunes, K. Ledbetter, J. Yang, M. Kozina, S. Weathersby, X. Shen, A. A. Cordones, T. J. A. Wolf, C. D. Pem- maraju, M. Ihme, and X. J. Wang, Imaging the short- lived hydroxyl-hydronium pair in ionized liquid water, Science374, 92 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    H. Yong, S. Sun, B. Gu, and S. Mukamel, Attosecond charge migration in molecules imaged by combined x-ray and electron diffraction, Journal of the American Chem- ical Society144, 20710 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Maxson, D

    J. Maxson, D. Cesar, G. Calmasini, A. Ody, P. Musumeci, and D. Alesini, Direct measurement of sub- 10 fs relativistic electron beams with ultralow emittance, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 154802 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    L. Zhao, Z. Wang, C. Lu, R. Wang, C. Hu, P. Wang, J. Qi, T. Jiang, S. Liu, Z. Ma, F. Qi, P. Zhu, Y. Cheng, Z. Shi, Y. Shi, W. Song, X. Zhu, J. Shi, Y. Wang, L. Yan, L. Zhu, D. Xiang, and J. Zhang, Terahertz streaking of few-femtosecond relativistic electron beams, Phys. Rev. X8, 021061 (2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    B. H. Schaap and P. Musumeci, Tomography of longi- tudinal phase space linearization for the generation of attosecond electron bunches, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 012802 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Filippetto, P

    D. Filippetto, P. Musumeci, R. K. Li, B. J. Siwick, M. R. Otto, M. Centurion, and J. P. F. Nunes, Ultrafast elec- tron diffraction: Visualizing dynamic states of matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045004 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    H. W. Kim, N. A. Vinokurov, I. H. Baek, K. Y. Oang, M. H. Kim, Y. C. Kim, K.-H. Jang, K. Lee, S. H. Park, S. Park, J. Shin, J. Kim, F. Rotermund, S. Cho, T. Feurer, and Y. U. Jeong, Towards jitter-free ultrafast electron diffraction technology, Nat. Photonics14, 245 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    F. Qi, Z. Ma, L. Zhao, Y. Cheng, W. Jiang, C. Lu, T. Jiang, D. Qian, Z. Wang, W. Zhang, P. Zhu, X. Zou, W. Wan, D. Xiang, and J. Zhang, Breaking 50 Fem- tosecond Resolution Barrier in MeV Ultrafast Electron Diffraction with a Double Bend Achromat Compressor, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 134803 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    E. C. Snively, M. A. K. Othman, M. Kozina, B. K. Ofori- Okai, S. P. Weathersby, S. Park, X. Shen, X. J. Wang, M. C. Hoffmann, R. K. Li, and E. A. Nanni, Femtosecond Compression Dynamics and Timing Jitter Suppression in a THz-driven Electron Bunch Compressor, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 054801 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    L. Zhao, T. Jiang, C. Lu, R. Wang, Z. Wang, P. Zhu, Y. Shi, W. Song, X. Zhu, C. Jing, S. Antipov, D. Xi- ang, and J. Zhang, Few-femtosecond electron beam with terahertz-frequency wakefield-driven compression, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams21, 082801 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    L. Zhao, H. Tang, C. Lu, T. Jiang, P. Zhu, L. Hu, W. Song, H. Wang, J. Qiu, C. Jing, S. Antipov, D. Xiang, and J. Zhang, Femtosecond relativistic electron beam with reduced timing jitter from thz driven beam com- pression, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 054802 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    C. Li, W. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Guo, X. Xu, Z. He, S. Zhang, Q. Jia, L. Wang, and D. He, Few-femtosecond mev electron bunches for ultrafast electron diffraction, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 064012 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    J. Lim, Y. Chong, and L. J. Wong, Terahertz-optical in- tensity grating for creating high-charge, attosecond elec- tron bunches, New J. Phys.21, 033020 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Morimoto and P

    Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Single-cycle optical control of beam electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 193202 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    See supplemental material, which includes Refs. [37–39], for details about (i) the kinematic derivation of the mod- ulation wavelength scaling law, (ii) the derivation of the continuous harmonic modulation theory, and (iii) the lon- gitudinal space charge effects

  41. [41]

    K.-J. Kim, Z. Huang, and R. R. Lindberg,Synchrotron Radiation and Free-Electron Lasers: Principles of Co- herent X-Ray Generation(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, The Physics of Free Electron Lasers(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999)

    1999

  43. [43]

    Stupakov and G

    G. Stupakov and G. Penn,Classical Mechanics and Elec- tromagnetism in Accelerator Physics(Springer, Cham, 2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    Petrov, Frequency down-conversion of solid-state laser sources to the mid-infrared spectral range using non- oxide nonlinear crystals, Progress in Quantum Electron- ics42, 1 (2015)

    V. Petrov, Frequency down-conversion of solid-state laser sources to the mid-infrared spectral range using non- oxide nonlinear crystals, Progress in Quantum Electron- ics42, 1 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Musumeci, C

    P. Musumeci, C. Pellegrini, and J. B. Rosenzweig, Higher harmonic inverse free-electron laser interaction, Phys. Rev. E72, 016501 (2005)

    2005

  46. [46]

    Hemsing, G

    E. Hemsing, G. Stupakov, D. Xiang, and A. Zholents, Beam by design: Laser manipulation of electrons in mod- ern accelerators, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 897 (2014)

    2014

  47. [47]

    Xiang, E

    D. Xiang, E. Hemsing, M. Dunning, C. Hast, T. O. Raubenheimer, S. Weathersby, and F. Fu, Demonstration of harmonic interaction in an undulator up to the 15th order, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams16, 110701 (2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    X. Wang, C. Feng, C.-Y. Tsai, L. Zeng, and Z. Zhao, Obliquely incident laser and electron beam interaction in an undulator, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams22, 070701 (2019)

    2019

  49. [49]

    Li and C.-X

    R.-K. Li and C.-X. Tang, Temporal resolution of mev ultrafast electron diffraction based on a photocathode rf gun, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A605, 243 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    Ardana-Lamas, S

    F. Ardana-Lamas, S. L. Cousin, J. Lignieres, and J. Biegert, Brilliant source of 19.2-attosecond soft x-ray pulses below the atomic unit of time, Ultrafast Science 5, 0128 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    10.5281/zenodo.19216949 (2026)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19216949 2026