Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 70 references

Diffusion Transformers replace residual addition with timestep-adaptive non-incremental aggregation to raise quality and cut training steps.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 17:48 UTC pith:CQB2RFTP

load-bearing objection DAR gives a concrete empirical win on DiT training speed via a new residual aggregator, but the link from the three diagnosed symptoms to the gains still needs tighter verification. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.20708 v2 pith:CQB2RFTP submitted 2026-05-20 cs.CV cs.AI

Rethinking Cross-Layer Information Routing in Diffusion Transformers

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords diffusion transformersresidual connectionscross-layer information flowadaptive routingimage generationtraining efficiencydenoising timestep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines cross-layer information flow in Diffusion Transformers along both depth and denoising timestep. It identifies three concrete problems created by standard residual addition: forward magnitude grows steadily, backward gradients decay sharply, and blocks become redundant. In response it introduces Diffusion-Adaptive Routing, a learnable replacement that aggregates prior sublayer outputs in a timestep-dependent, non-incremental way. The change improves FID on ImageNet 256 by 2.11 points for a large SiT model and reaches the same final quality after roughly one-ninth the iterations; the method also stacks with representation-alignment techniques for further early-stage speed-ups and transfers to fine-tuning of text-to-image models.

Core claim

Diffusion-Adaptive Routing performs learnable, timestep-adaptive, and non-incremental aggregation over the history of sublayer outputs, directly replacing the residual stream inherited from the original Transformer and thereby correcting monotonic forward magnitude inflation, sharp backward gradient decay, and block-wise redundancy.

What carries the argument

Diffusion-Adaptive Routing (DAR), a drop-in module that learns to aggregate the sequence of sublayer outputs adaptively according to the current denoising timestep rather than adding them incrementally.

Load-bearing premise

The three observed symptoms of traditional residual addition are the primary causes of suboptimal DiT behavior and can be relieved by non-incremental timestep-adaptive aggregation without introducing new instabilities.

What would settle it

Train identical DiT models with and without DAR while recording forward activation magnitudes, backward gradient norms per block, and pairwise block output correlations at multiple timesteps; the claim is falsified if the three symptoms remain unchanged or if training diverges.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • On ImageNet 256×256, DAR raises SiT-XL/2 performance from 9.67 to 7.56 FID.
  • DAR reaches the baseline converged quality after 8.75 times fewer training iterations.
  • When combined with REPA, DAR produces a 2 times acceleration in the early training stage.
  • DAR can be inserted during fine-tuning of large text-to-image models while preserving high-frequency detail under Distribution Matching Distillation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cross-layer routing appears to operate independently of representation-alignment objectives.
  • Similar adaptive aggregation of layer history may be worth testing in non-diffusion transformer generators.
  • Redesigning the residual path could reduce the depth or width needed to reach a target generation quality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that traditional residual addition in Diffusion Transformers exhibits three symptoms—monotonic forward magnitude inflation, sharp backward gradient decay, and pronounced block-wise redundancy—identified via joint analysis over depth and denoising timestep. It proposes Diffusion-Adaptive Routing (DAR) as a drop-in replacement performing learnable, timestep-adaptive, non-incremental aggregation of sublayer outputs. On ImageNet 256×256, DAR improves SiT-XL/2 from 9.67 to 7.56 FID and reaches baseline converged quality with 8.75× fewer iterations; when stacked with REPA it yields 2× early-stage acceleration, and it extends to T2I fine-tuning and distillation while preserving high-frequency details.

Significance. If the reported gains prove robust, the work establishes cross-layer routing as a concrete, falsifiable, and orthogonal design axis in DiTs, delivering measurable training acceleration and quality improvements alongside compatibility with representation-alignment methods such as REPA. The empirical diagnosis and drop-in nature of DAR make the central claims directly testable on standard benchmarks.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (main results and ablations)] §4 (main results and ablations): the central claim that DAR mitigates the three diagnosed symptoms to produce the 2.11 FID gain and 8.75× iteration reduction is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no details on random seeds, run count, or statistical significance; without these controls it is impossible to rule out that the reported deltas arise from training stochasticity rather than the proposed aggregation.
  2. [§3 (empirical diagnosis)] §3 (empirical diagnosis): the motivation rests on the assumption that the three observed symptoms are the primary drivers of suboptimal DiT performance and that non-incremental aggregation can mitigate them without new instabilities; however, no controlled ablation isolates each symptom’s contribution or shows that DAR’s gains disappear when the symptoms are artificially suppressed, leaving the causal link unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions for the forward-magnitude and gradient-decay plots should explicitly label the timestep axis and include error bands across multiple runs for clarity.
  2. The compatibility claim with REPA is stated in the abstract and conclusion; a dedicated combined-results table or subsection would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation of minor revision. We address each major comment below, committing to clarifications where appropriate while noting limitations in the current experimental design.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4 (main results and ablations)] §4 (main results and ablations): the central claim that DAR mitigates the three diagnosed symptoms to produce the 2.11 FID gain and 8.75× iteration reduction is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no details on random seeds, run count, or statistical significance; without these controls it is impossible to rule out that the reported deltas arise from training stochasticity rather than the proposed aggregation.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of seed, run count, and significance details leaves the results vulnerable to concerns about stochasticity. In the revised manuscript we will report all main results (FID, convergence iterations) as means over at least three independent runs with distinct random seeds, together with standard deviations, and will include a brief note on the observed variance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (empirical diagnosis)] §3 (empirical diagnosis): the motivation rests on the assumption that the three observed symptoms are the primary drivers of suboptimal DiT performance and that non-incremental aggregation can mitigate them without new instabilities; however, no controlled ablation isolates each symptom’s contribution or shows that DAR’s gains disappear when the symptoms are artificially suppressed, leaving the causal link unverified.

    Authors: Section 3 presents a joint depth-and-timestep analysis that documents the three symptoms under standard residual addition. DAR is explicitly constructed to replace incremental addition with learnable, timestep-adaptive, non-incremental aggregation, and the reported gains are consistent with this design choice. We acknowledge that a controlled experiment artificially suppressing each symptom individually and then measuring the disappearance of DAR’s advantage is not present; such an ablation would require additional controlled training regimes beyond the scope of the current study. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A controlled ablation that isolates the contribution of each of the three symptoms and demonstrates that DAR’s gains vanish once those symptoms are artificially suppressed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper performs an empirical diagnosis of three residual-stream symptoms in DiTs and proposes DAR as a drop-in architectural replacement whose value is shown via direct ImageNet 256×256 FID deltas (2.11 improvement) and iteration-count reductions (8.75×). No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the reported metrics are independent experimental outcomes. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical diagnosis of three symptoms being both accurate and causally addressable by the proposed routing change; no free parameters or invented entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The three symptoms (magnitude inflation, gradient decay, block redundancy) are primarily caused by standard residual addition and are the dominant performance bottlenecks in DiTs.
    The motivation section of the abstract directly links these symptoms to the choice of residual stream.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5873 in / 1209 out tokens · 29898 ms · 2026-06-30T17:48:23.551983+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) have become a de facto backbone of modern visual generation, and nearly every major axis of their design -- tokenization, attention, conditioning, objectives, and latent autoencoders -- has been extensively revisited. The residual stream that governs how information accumulates across layers, however, has been directly inherited from the original Transformer. In this paper, we present a systematic empirical analysis of cross-layer information flow in DiTs, jointly along depth and denoising timestep, and identify three concrete symptoms of traditional residual addition, namely monotonic forward magnitude inflation, sharp backward gradient decay, and pronounced block-wise redundancy. Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose Diffusion-Adaptive Routing (\textsc{DAR}), a drop-in residual replacement that performs \emph{learnable, timestep-adaptive, and non-incremental} aggregation over the history of sublayer outputs. Moreover, the proposed \textsc{DAR} is compatible with many modern Transformer enhancement methods, such as REPA. On ImageNet $256\times256$, \textsc{DAR} improves SiT-XL/2 by $2.11$ FID ($7.56$ vs.\ $9.67$) and matches the baseline's converged quality with $8.75\times$ fewer training iterations. Stacked on top of REPA, it yields a $2\times$ training acceleration in the early stage, suggesting cross-layer information routing as an underexplored design axis in diffusion modeling, one that operates orthogonally to existing representation-alignment objectives. Beyond pretraining, \textsc{DAR} can also be applied during the fine-tuning stage of large-scale T2I models and preserves high-frequency details during Distribution Matching Distillation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rezero is all you need: Fast convergence at large depth

    Thomas Bachlechner, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Henry Mao, Gary Cottrell, and Julian McAuley. Rezero is all you need: Fast convergence at large depth. InUncertainty in artificial intelligence, pages 1352–1361. PMLR, 2021

  2. [2]

    All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models

    Fan Bao, Shen Nie, Kaiwen Xue, Yue Cao, Chongxuan Li, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22669–22679, 2023

  3. [3]

    Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformer

    Huanqia Cai, Sihan Cao, Ruoyi Du, Peng Gao, Steven Hoi, Zhaohui Hou, Shijie Huang, Dengyang Jiang, Xin Jin, Liangchen Li, et al. Z-image: An efficient image generation foundation model with single-stream diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22699, 2025

  4. [4]

    Towards stabilized and efficient diffusion transformers through long-skip-connections with spectral constraints

    Guanjie Chen, Xinyu Zhao, Yucheng Zhou, Xiaoye Qu, Tianlong Chen, and Yu Cheng. Towards stabilized and efficient diffusion transformers through long-skip-connections with spectral constraints. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 17708–17718, 2025

  5. [5]

    Sortblock: Similarity-aware feature reuse for diffusion model

    Hanqi Chen, Xu Zhang, Xiaoliu Guan, Lielin Jiang, Guanzhong Wang, Zeyu Chen, and Yi Liu. Sortblock: Similarity-aware feature reuse for diffusion model. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 40, pages 2859–2867, 2026

  6. [6]

    PixArt-$\alpha$: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesis

    Junsong Chen, Jincheng Yu, Chongjian Ge, Lewei Yao, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Zhongdao Wang, James Kwok, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, et al. PixArt-α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00426, 2023

  7. [7]

    Pixart-σ: Weak-to-strong training of diffusion transformer for 4k text-to-image generation

    Junsong Chen, Chongjian Ge, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Lewei Yao, Xiaozhe Ren, Zhongdao Wang, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, and Zhenguo Li. Pixart-σ: Weak-to-strong training of diffusion transformer for 4k text-to-image generation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 74–91. Springer, 2024

  8. [8]

    Pixart-{\delta}: Fast and controllable image generation with latent consistency models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05252, 2024

    Junsong Chen, Yue Wu, Simian Luo, Enze Xie, Sayak Paul, Ping Luo, Hang Zhao, and Zhenguo Li. Pixart-{\delta}: Fast and controllable image generation with latent consistency models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05252, 2024

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10733 (2024) 10

    Junyu Chen, Han Cai, Junsong Chen, Enze Xie, Shang Yang, Haotian Tang, Muyang Li, Yao Lu, and Song Han. Deep compression autoencoder for efficient high-resolution diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10733, 2024

  10. [10]

    Playing with transformer at 30+ fps via next-frame diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01380, 2025

    Xinle Cheng, Tianyu He, Jiayi Xu, Junliang Guo, Di He, and Jiang Bian. Playing with transformer at 30+ fps via next-frame diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01380, 2025

  11. [11]

    Describe, don’t dictate: Semantic image editing with natural language intent

    En Ci, Shanyan Guan, Yanhao Ge, Yilin Zhang, Wei Li, Zhenyu Zhang, Jian Yang, and Ying Tai. Describe, don’t dictate: Semantic image editing with natural language intent. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19185–19194, 2025

  12. [12]

    Causal diffusion transformers for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12095, 2024

    Chaorui Deng, Deyao Zhu, Kunchang Li, Shi Guang, and Haoqi Fan. Causal diffusion transformers for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12095, 2024

  13. [13]

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. InForty-first international conference on machine learning, 2024. 10

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05945 , year=

    Peng Gao, Le Zhuo, Dongyang Liu, Ruoyi Du, Xu Luo, Longtian Qiu, Yuhang Zhang, Chen Lin, Rongjie Huang, Shijie Geng, et al. Lumina-t2x: Transforming text into any modality, resolution, and duration via flow-based large diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05945, 2024

  15. [15]

    LTX-2: Efficient Joint Audio-Visual Foundation Model

    Yoav HaCohen, Benny Brazowski, Nisan Chiprut, Yaki Bitterman, Andrew Kvochko, Avishai Berkowitz, Daniel Shalem, Daphna Lifschitz, Dudu Moshe, Eitan Porat, et al. Ltx-2: Efficient joint audio-visual foundation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03233, 2026

  16. [16]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016

  17. [17]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

  18. [18]

    Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022

  19. [19]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

  20. [20]

    Densely connected convolutional networks

    Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4700–4708, 2017

  21. [21]

    Self Forcing: Bridging the Train-Test Gap in Autoregressive Video Diffusion

    Xun Huang, Zhengqi Li, Guande He, Mingyuan Zhou, and Eli Shechtman. Self forcing: Bridging the train-test gap in autoregressive video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08009, 2025

  22. [22]

    Tracing representation progression: Analyzing and enhancing layer-wise similarity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14479, 2024

    Jiachen Jiang, Jinxin Zhou, and Zhihui Zhu. Tracing representation progression: Analyzing and enhancing layer-wise similarity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14479, 2024

  23. [23]

    Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:26565–26577, 2022

    Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, and Samuli Laine. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:26565–26577, 2022

  24. [24]

    Variational diffusion models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:21696–21707, 2021

    Diederik Kingma, Tim Salimans, Ben Poole, and Jonathan Ho. Variational diffusion models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:21696–21707, 2021

  25. [25]

    HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Models

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

  26. [26]

    Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    Tuomas Kynkäänniemi, Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila. Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

  27. [27]

    Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    Black Forest Labs. Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

  28. [28]

    Black Forest Labs, Stephen Batifol, Andreas Blattmann, Frederic Boesel, Saksham Consul, Cyril Diagne, Tim Dockhorn, Jack English, Zion English, Patrick Esser, et al. Flux. 1 kontext: Flow matching for in-context image generation and editing in latent space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15742, 2025

  29. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10483 , year=

    Xingjian Leng, Jaskirat Singh, Yunzhong Hou, Zhenchang Xing, Saining Xie, and Liang Zheng. Repa-e: Unlocking vae for end-to-end tuning with latent diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10483, 2025

  30. [30]

    SiameseNorm: Breaking the Barrier to Reconciling Pre/Post-Norm

    Tianyu Li, Dongchen Han, Zixuan Cao, Haofeng Huang, Mengyu Zhou, Ming Chen, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang, and Gao Huang. Siamesenorm: Breaking the barrier to reconciling pre/post-norm.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08064, 2026

  31. [31]

    Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion transformer with fine-grained chinese understanding, 2024

    Zhimin Li, Jianwei Zhang, Qin Lin, Jiangfeng Xiong, Yanxin Long, Xinchi Deng, Yingfang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Minbin Huang, Zedong Xiao, Dayou Chen, Jiajun He, Jiahao Li, Wenyue Li, Chen Zhang, Rongwei Quan, Jianxiang Lu, Jiabin Huang, Xiaoyan Yuan, Xiaoxiao Zheng, Yixuan Li, Jihong Zhang, Chao Zhang, Meng Chen, Jie Liu, Zheng Fang, Weiyan Wang, Jinbao Xue,...

  32. [32]

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky TQ Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022. 11

  33. [33]

    Playground v3: Improving text-to-image alignment with deep-fusion large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10695, 2024

    Bingchen Liu, Ehsan Akhgari, Alexander Visheratin, Aleks Kamko, Linmiao Xu, Shivam Shrirao, João Pedro Gan- darela de Souza, Suhail Doshi, and Daiqing Li. Playground v3: Improving text-to-image alignment with deep- fusion large language models.ArXiv, abs/2409.10695, 2024. URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 272694430

  34. [34]

    Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow

    Xingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022

  35. [35]

    Sit: Exploring flow and diffusion-based generative models with scalable interpolant transformers

    Nanye Ma, Mark Goldstein, Michael S Albergo, Nicholas M Boffi, Eric Vanden-Eijnden, and Saining Xie. Sit: Exploring flow and diffusion-based generative models with scalable interpolant transformers. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 23–40. Springer, 2024

  36. [36]

    Shortgpt: Layers in large language models are more redundant than you expect

    Xin Men, Mingyu Xu, Qingyu Zhang, Qianhao Yuan, Bingning Wang, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, and Weipeng Chen. Shortgpt: Layers in large language models are more redundant than you expect. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pages 20192–20204, 2025

  37. [37]

    Generating images with sparse representations

    Charlie Nash, Jacob Menick, Sander Dieleman, and Peter Battaglia. Generating images with sparse representations. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7958–7968. PMLR, 2021

  38. [38]

    Transformers without tears: Improving the normalization of self-attention

    Toan Q Nguyen and Julian Salazar. Transformers without tears: Improving the normalization of self-attention. InProceedings of the 16th international conference on spoken language translation, 2019

  39. [39]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR, 2021

  40. [40]

    Denseformer: Enhancing information flow in transformers via depth weighted averaging.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:136479–136508, 2024

    Matteo Pagliardini, Amirkeivan Mohtashami, Francois Fleuret, and Martin Jaggi. Denseformer: Enhancing information flow in transformers via depth weighted averaging.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:136479–136508, 2024

  41. [41]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

  42. [42]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022

  43. [43]

    Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge.International journal of computer vision, 115(3):211–252, 2015

    Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge.International journal of computer vision, 115(3):211–252, 2015

  44. [44]

    Improved techniques for training gans.Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016

    Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training gans.Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016

  45. [45]

    A phase transition in diffusion models reveals the hierarchical nature of data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(1):e2408799121, 2025

    Antonio Sclocchi, Alessandro Favero, and Matthieu Wyart. A phase transition in diffusion models reveals the hierarchical nature of data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(1):e2408799121, 2025

  46. [46]

    Seedream 4.0: Toward Next-generation Multimodal Image Generation

    Team Seedream, Yunpeng Chen, Yu Gao, Lixue Gong, Meng Guo, Qiushan Guo, Zhiyao Guo, Xiaoxia Hou, Weilin Huang, Yixuan Huang, et al. Seedream 4.0: Toward next-generation multimodal image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20427, 2025

  47. [47]

    Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics

    Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 2256–2265. pmlr, 2015

  48. [48]

    Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

  49. [49]

    Sleb: Streamlining llms through redundancy verification and elimination of transformer blocks

    Jiwon Song, Kyungseok Oh, Taesu Kim, Hyungjun Kim, Yulhwa Kim, and Jae-Joon Kim. Sleb: Streamlining llms through redundancy verification and elimination of transformer blocks. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 46136–46155. PMLR, 2024

  50. [50]

    Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020

  51. [51]

    Highway Networks

    Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, Klaus Greff, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Highway networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00387, 2015. 12

  52. [52]

    Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer

    Zhenxiong Tan, Songhua Liu, Xingyi Yang, Qiaochu Xue, and Xinchao Wang. Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14940–14950, 2025

  53. [53]

    Attention Residuals

    Kimi Team, Guangyu Chen, Yu Zhang, Jianlin Su, Weixin Xu, Siyuan Pan, Yaoyu Wang, Yucheng Wang, Guanduo Chen, Bohong Yin, et al. Attention residuals.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15031, 2026

  54. [54]

    U-dits: Downsample tokens in u-shaped diffusion transformers.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:51994–52013, 2024

    Yuchuan Tian, Zhijun Tu, Hanting Chen, Jie Hu, Chao Xu, and Yunhe Wang. U-dits: Downsample tokens in u-shaped diffusion transformers.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:51994–52013, 2024

  55. [55]

    Going deeper with image transformers

    Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Hervé Jégou. Going deeper with image transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 32–42, 2021

  56. [56]

    Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianx- iao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

  57. [57]

    Deepnet: Scaling transformers to 1,000 layers.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(10):6761–6774, 2024

    Hongyu Wang, Shuming Ma, Li Dong, Shaohan Huang, Dongdong Zhang, and Furu Wei. Deepnet: Scaling transformers to 1,000 layers.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(10):6761–6774, 2024

  58. [58]

    Qwen-Image Technical Report

    Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng-ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, et al. Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025

  59. [59]

    SANA: Efficient High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Linear Diffusion Transformers

    Enze Xie, Junsong Chen, Junyu Chen, Han Cai, Haotian Tang, Yujun Lin, Zhekai Zhang, Muyang Li, Ligeng Zhu, Yao Lu, et al. Sana: Efficient high-resolution image synthesis with linear diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10629, 2024

  60. [60]

    mHC: Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections

    Zhenda Xie, Yixuan Wei, Huanqi Cao, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Jiashi Li, Damai Dai, Huazuo Gao, Jiang Chang, Kuai Yu, et al. mhc: Manifold-constrained hyper-connections.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24880, 2025

  61. [61]

    On layer normalization in the transformer architecture

    Ruibin Xiong, Yunchang Yang, Di He, Kai Zheng, Shuxin Zheng, Chen Xing, Huishuai Zhang, Yanyan Lan, Liwei Wang, and Tieyan Liu. On layer normalization in the transformer architecture. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 10524–10533. PMLR, 2020

  62. [62]

    CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

  63. [63]

    Reconstruction vs

    Jingfeng Yao, Bin Yang, and Xinggang Wang. Reconstruction vs. generation: Taming optimization dilemma in latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 15703–15712, 2025

  64. [64]

    Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:47455–47487, 2024

    Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Taesung Park, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Fredo Durand, and William T Freeman. Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:47455–47487, 2024

  65. [65]

    One-step diffusion with distribution matching distillation

    Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Fredo Durand, William T Freeman, and Taesung Park. One-step diffusion with distribution matching distillation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6613–6623, 2024

  66. [66]

    Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think

    Sihyun Yu, Sangkyung Kwak, Huiwon Jang, Jongheon Jeong, Jonathan Huang, Jinwoo Shin, and Saining Xie. Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

  67. [67]

    Test-Time Training Done Right

    Tianyuan Zhang, Sai Bi, Yicong Hong, Kai Zhang, Fujun Luan, Songlin Yang, Kalyan Sunkavalli, William T Freeman, and Hao Tan. Test-time training done right.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23884, 2025

  68. [68]

    Easycontrol: Adding efficient and flexible control for diffusion transformer

    Yuxuan Zhang, Yirui Yuan, Yiren Song, Haofan Wang, and Jiaming Liu. Easycontrol: Adding efficient and flexible control for diffusion transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19513–19524, 2025

  69. [69]

    Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoders

    Boyang Zheng, Nanye Ma, Shengbang Tong, and Saining Xie. Diffusion transformers with representation autoencoders.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11690, 2025. 13

  70. [70]

    14 A Summary Table of Related Work We provide a comparative summary of deterministic weather models in table

    Defa Zhu, Hongzhi Huang, Zihao Huang, Yutao Zeng, Yunyao Mao, Banggu Wu, Qiyang Min, and Xun Zhou. Hyper-connections.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19606, 2024. 14 In the Appendix, we provide supplementary materials for our work “Rethinking Cross-Layer Information Routing in Diffusion Transformers”, organized according to the corresponding sections in the main...