pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.01490 · v2 · submitted 2024-08-02 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el

Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT

Christian Copetti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-el
keywords defect chargesgapped boundary conditionsSymmetry TFTgeneralized symmetrieshigher representationscodimension defectsdimensional reductiont Hooft anomalies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher charges of codimension-p defects correspond one-to-one with gapped boundary conditions of the Symmetry TFT on a product manifold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the higher representations, or charges, of a defect of codimension p under generalized symmetries match exactly the gapped boundary conditions of the Symmetry TFT on the manifold formed by the defect worldvolume times a sphere. This match is made efficient by dimensional reduction. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a uniform computational handle on how defects transform under symmetries, including in theories that carry bulk anomalies yet still admit symmetric defects. The same construction generalizes the known link between 't Hooft anomalies and the lack of symmetric boundaries to defects of every codimension.

Core claim

For a defect D of codimension p, its higher representations (charges) under generalized symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with gapped boundary conditions for the SymTFT Z(C) on the manifold Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1}, and these charges are efficiently described through dimensional reduction. The construction applies when an anomalous bulk theory hosts a symmetric defect, thereby generalizing the connection between 't Hooft anomalies and the absence of symmetric boundary conditions to defects of any codimension. It also records properties of surface charges for (3+1)d duality symmetries.

What carries the argument

The Symmetry TFT Z(C), whose gapped boundary conditions on the product manifold Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1} classify the higher charges of codimension-p defects.

If this is right

  • An anomalous bulk theory can host a symmetric defect.
  • The absence of symmetric boundary conditions caused by 't Hooft anomalies extends directly to defects of arbitrary codimension.
  • Surface charges of (3+1)d duality symmetries admit a description that bears on Gukov-Witten operators in gauge theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reduction technique could be used to enumerate allowed charges for defects in specific models such as four-dimensional gauge theories.
  • The correspondence supplies a route to check anomaly inflow at defects by inspecting the boundary conditions of the Symmetry TFT.
  • The method may extend to interfaces or domain walls by replacing the sphere factor with an appropriate linking manifold.

Load-bearing premise

The Symmetry TFT framework captures every generalized symmetry of the original theory and the gapped boundary conditions on the product manifold Y faithfully encode the higher charges of the defects.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in a concrete quantum field theory that produces a defect charge with no corresponding gapped boundary condition of the associated Symmetry TFT on Y, or a dimensional reduction that yields inconsistent charges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2408.01490 by Christian Copetti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SymTFT setup. Left the sandwich construction for th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Correspondence between defects and boundary condi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sym TFT setup for a boundary condition (Left) an for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SymTFT setup for a boundary multiplet (Right) and fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Wedge compactification allows to describe a bounda [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sliding a symmetry operator across the order param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left, M as a map between C[S p−1 ] and C ∗ [S p−1 ]M . Right, interval compactification of a generic map between C and C ∗ M . The C symmetry acts on the defect D through its topological endpoints eL. These must satisfy various consistency conditions – which we do not report here – but coincide with those described on the defect worldvolume. These are packages in the data of an higher module category over … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top-left: the bulk to defect OPE of a charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left, description of a twisted sector defect in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Above, interpretation of the 2Group stucture on t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We offer a streamlined and computationally powerful characterization of higher representations (higher charges) for defect operators under generalized symmetries, employing the powerful framework of Symmetry TFT $\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})$. For a defect $\mathscr{D}$ of codimension p, these representations (charges) are in one-to-one correspondence with gapped boundary conditions for the SymTFT $\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})$ on a manifold $Y = \Sigma_{d-p+1} \times S^{p-1}$, and can be efficiently described through dimensional reduction. We explore numerous applications of our construction, including scenarios where an anomalous bulk theory can host a symmetric defect. This generalizes the connection between 't Hooft anomalies and the absence of symmetric boundary conditions to defects of any codimension. Finally we describe some properties of surface charges for (3 + 1)d duality symmetries, which should be relevant to the study of Gukov-Witten operators in gauge theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a characterization of higher representations (charges) of codimension-p defect operators under generalized symmetries via the Symmetry TFT Z(C). It asserts a one-to-one correspondence between these charges and gapped boundary conditions of Z(C) on the manifold Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1}, obtained through dimensional reduction. Applications include symmetric defects in anomalous bulk theories (generalizing the anomaly-boundary connection) and properties of surface charges for (3+1)d duality symmetries relevant to Gukov-Witten operators.

Significance. If the claimed correspondence is rigorously bijective and preserves fusion and anomaly data, the construction supplies an efficient computational tool for higher charges of defects in generalized symmetry settings. It extends existing SymTFT methods to codimension-p defects and could aid analysis of non-invertible symmetries and duality defects. The dimensional-reduction approach is presented as a strength for practical calculations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (central construction): the one-to-one correspondence between higher charges and gapped boundaries after reduction on S^{p-1} is asserted without an explicit general proof that the map is bijective for arbitrary p and non-invertible C. The reduction must commute with fusion rules and anomaly data; if higher morphisms in Z(C) or defect-induced modifications on the linking sphere produce extra/missing boundaries, the correspondence fails. A concrete check against a known non-invertible example (e.g., a specific fusion category C) is needed to confirm no data loss.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the manifold Y and the codimension p should be introduced with a diagram or explicit example in the introduction to aid readability.
  2. [Applications] The applications section would benefit from one fully worked example with explicit boundary conditions listed for a low-dimensional case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and valuable feedback on our manuscript. The central construction in §3 is indeed presented as following from the dimensional reduction in the SymTFT, and we address the request for greater rigor below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (central construction): the one-to-one correspondence between higher charges and gapped boundaries after reduction on S^{p-1} is asserted without an explicit general proof that the map is bijective for arbitrary p and non-invertible C. The reduction must commute with fusion rules and anomaly data; if higher morphisms in Z(C) or defect-induced modifications on the linking sphere produce extra/missing boundaries, the correspondence fails. A concrete check against a known non-invertible example (e.g., a specific fusion category C) is needed to confirm no data loss.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit general argument establishing bijectivity for arbitrary p and non-invertible C, together with preservation of fusion and anomaly data under reduction, would strengthen the presentation. The correspondence is defined by associating to each defect charge the gapped boundary condition obtained by reducing Z(C) on the linking sphere S^{p-1}; bijectivity follows from the fact that every gapped boundary of the reduced theory lifts to a unique charge sector of the defect, with no additional boundaries generated by higher morphisms because the SymTFT is topological and the reduction is performed away from the defect support. Nevertheless, to address the concern directly we will add a new subsection in §3 that (i) proves the reduction functor commutes with fusion by using the monoidal structure of Z(C) and (ii) verifies anomaly matching by showing that the 't Hooft anomaly of the defect is reproduced by the boundary anomaly of the reduced theory. We will also include an explicit check for a non-invertible example, taking C to be the Ising fusion category (with the corresponding SymTFT being the toric-code-like theory), confirming that the map is bijective and that no data is lost or added. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: characterization derived within external SymTFT framework

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a new characterization of defect charges via gapped boundaries of the pre-existing SymTFT Z(C) on the product manifold Y, obtained through dimensional reduction. This is presented as an application of the established framework rather than a self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce the claimed one-to-one correspondence to an input by construction. The construction is self-contained against the external SymTFT benchmark and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatze from the author's own prior work as the sole justification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the pre-existing Symmetry TFT construction Z(C) for a symmetry category C and on the assumption that gapped boundaries on the indicated product manifold capture defect charges; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Symmetry TFT Z(C) exists and encodes the generalized symmetries of the bulk theory for any relevant category C.
    Invoked as the foundational framework for the entire characterization of defect charges.
  • domain assumption Gapped boundary conditions of Z(C) on Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1} are in one-to-one correspondence with higher charges of codimension-p defects.
    This is the load-bearing mapping asserted in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5684 in / 1488 out tokens · 19020 ms · 2026-05-23T22:00:08.366770+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Twist on Scattering from Defect Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect 't Hooft anomalies trap charges at symmetry-line junctions and thereby drive categorical scattering into twist operators.

  2. When Symmetries Twist: Anomaly Inflow on Monodromy Defects

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Monodromy defects for anomalous symmetries are defined as domain walls between symmetry generators and anomaly-induced topological orders, resulting in protected chiral edge modes and adiabatic pumping of gapless degr...

  3. Notes on (-2)-form symmetries

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces (-2)-form symmetries that modify the SymTFT action to relate QFTs differing by anomaly data or non-invertible symmetry associators, illustrated in 2D-4D models, fusion categories, club-sandwich RG flows, an...

  4. When Symmetries Twist: Anomaly Inflow on Monodromy Defects

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Anomaly inflow on monodromy defects in anomalous symmetry theories defines them as domain walls inducing topological order, yielding protected chiral edge modes and adiabatic pumping of gapless degrees of freedom, ver...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized G lobal Symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2015) 172 , arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFT_d

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “The Bootstrap Progr am for Boundary CFTd,” JHEP 07 (2013) 113 , arXiv:1210.4258 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Defects in conformal field theory

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, “Defects in con formal field theory,” JHEP 04 (2016) 091 , arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th] . 31See also [ 93–95] for applications of generalized symmetries to the Callan-Rubakov e ffect and [ 96] for a violation of crossing symmetry in (2+1)d Chern-Simons-matter the ories. 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Boundary Conformal Field Theory and a Boundary Central Charge

    C. P. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, “Boundary Conformal Field Theor y and a Boundary Central Charge,” JHEP 10 (2017) 189 , arXiv:1707.06224 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on N on-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible genera lized symmetries,” Phys. Rept. 1063 (2024) 1–55 , arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, vol. 205. American Mathematical Soc., 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    C. J. Schommer-Pries, The classification of two-dimensional extended topologica l field theories. University of California, Berkeley, 2009

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Finite semisimple module 2-categories

    T. D. D´ ecoppet, “Finite Semisimple Module 2-Categories,” arXiv:2107.11037 [math.QA]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “ Non-invertible symmetry webs,” SciPost Phys. 15 no. 4, (2023) 160 , arXiv:2212.06842 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmet ry in quantum field theory,” arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  12. [12]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hossein i, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 402 no. 1, (2023) 895–949 , arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “A unified view on symmetry, anomalous symm etry and non-invertible gravitational anomaly,” arXiv:2106.02069 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, “Symmetry as a shadow of topolo gical order and a derivation of topological holographic principle,” Phys. Rev. B 107 no. 15, (2023) 155136 , arXiv:2203.03596 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized charges, p art I: Invertible symmetries and higher representations,” SciPost Phys. 16 no. 4, (2024) 093 , arXiv:2304.02660 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, P art II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,” arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Higher representations for extended operators,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Higher represent ations for extended operators,” arXiv:2304.03789 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Representation t heory for categorical symmetries,” arXiv:2305.17165 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,” Commun. Math. Phys. 401 no. 3, (2023) 3043–3107 , arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Wilson-'t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S-duality

    A. Kapustin, “Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional ga uge theories and S-duality,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 025005 , arXiv:hep-th/0501015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    Generalised symmetries and st ate-operator correspondence for nonlocal operators,

    D. M. Hofman and S. Vitouladitis, “Generalised symmetries and st ate-operator correspondence for nonlocal operators,” arXiv:2406.02662 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states,

    S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng, “Topological holography, quantum c riticality, and boundary states,” arXiv:2310.16878 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    To appear,

    L. Bhardwaj, C. Copetti, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “ To appear,”. 34

    work page

  24. [24]

    Bashmakov, M

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan, and J. Kaidi, “Non-inve rtible symmetries of class S theories,” JHEP 05 (2023) 225 , arXiv:2211.05138 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Antinucci, C

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, ““Zoology” of non -invertible duality defects: the view from class S,” JHEP 04 (2024) 036 , arXiv:2212.09549 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    S-matrix bootstra p & non-invertible symmetries,

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, “S-matrix bootstra p & non-invertible symmetries,” To appear (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: Partition functions

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 353–497 , arXiv:hep-th/0204148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  28. [28]

    Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, “Non-Invertible Sym metries, Anomalies and Scattering Amplitudes,” arXiv:2403.04835 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Particle-soliton degeneracies from spontaneously broken non-invertible symmetry,

    C. Cordova, D. Garc ´ ıa-Sep´ ulveda, and N. Holfester, “Particle-Soliton Degeneracies from Spontaneously Broken Non-Invertible Symmetry,” arXiv:2403.08883 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, “Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,” arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory

    M. Buican and A. Gromov, “Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects , and Conformal Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 356 no. 3, (2017) 1017–1056 , arXiv:1701.02800 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “ Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2405.05964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Dimens ionally reducing generalized symmetries from (3+1)-dimensions,

    E. Nardoni, M. Sacchi, O. Sela, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Dimens ionally reducing generalized symmetries from (3+1)-dimensions,” JHEP 07 (2024) 110 , arXiv:2403.15995 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Sch¨ afer-Namek i, “Gapped Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries: (1+1)d,” arXiv:2310.03784 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,” arXiv:2310.03786 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, “Holographic theory for continu ous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness,” Phys. Rev. B 108 no. 7, (2023) 075105 , arXiv:2205.06244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    't Hooft anomalies and boundaries

    K. Jensen, E. Shaverin, and A. Yarom, “’t Hooft anomalies and b oundaries,” JHEP 01 (2018) 085 , arXiv:1710.07299 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, “Anomalous symmetries end at the b oundary,” JHEP 09 (2021) 017 , arXiv:2012.15861 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Remarks on boundaries, anomalies, and noninvertible symmetries,

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, Y. Sanghavi, and S.-H. Shao, “Remarks on boundaries, anomalies, and noninvertible symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 12, (2023) 125005 , arXiv:2305.09713 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases,

    C. C´ ordova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetr y Preserving Gapped Phases,” arXiv:1910.04962 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1910

  41. [41]

    Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Topological boundary conditions in a belian Chern-Simons theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 845 (2011) 393–435 , arXiv:1008.0654 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Surface operators in 3d Topologica l Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory,” arXiv:1012.0911 [hep-th] . 35

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Kong, Nuclear Physics B886, 436 (2014), arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    L. Kong, “Anyon condensation and tensor categories,” Nucl. Phys. B 886 (2014) 436–482 , arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Kaidi, Z

    J. Kaidi, Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Sha o, “Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 3, (2022) 067 , arXiv:2107.13091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Copetti, and L. Di Pietro, “Factorization and globa l symmetries in holography,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 2, (2023) 019 , arXiv:2203.09537 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    3d Abelian Gauge Theories at the Boundary

    L. Di Pietro, D. Gaiotto, E. Lauria, and J. Wu, “3d Abelian Gauge Theories at the Boundary,” JHEP 05 (2019) 091 , arXiv:1902.09567 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Cluster decomposition, T-duality, and gerby CFT's

    S. Hellerman, A. Henriques, T. Pantev, E. Sharpe, and M. Ando , “Cluster decomposition, T-duality, and gerby CFT’s,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11 no. 5, (2007) 751–818 , arXiv:hep-th/0606034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  48. [48]

    Decomposition, Condens ation Defects, and Fusion,

    L. Lin, D. G. Robbins, and E. Sharpe, “Decomposition, Condens ation Defects, and Fusion,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 no. 11, (2022) 2200130 , arXiv:2208.05982 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D C onformal Field Theory,

    E. P. Verlinde, “Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D C onformal Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 300 (1988) 360–376

    work page 1988

  50. [50]

    Construction of two-dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries,

    T.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Lin, and S. Seifnashri, “Construction of two -dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries,” JHEP 12 (2021) 028 , arXiv:2110.02958 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d

    P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on One-Form G lobal Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d,” SciPost Phys. 6 no. 3, (2019) 039 , arXiv:1812.04716 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,

    R. Argurio, F. Benini, M. Bertolini, G. Galati, and P. Niro, “On the s ymmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,” JHEP 07 (2024) 130 , arXiv:2404.06601 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-inve rtible Defects,” Commun. Math. Phys. 404 no. 2, (2023) 1021–1124 , arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Antinucci,F

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holo graphy of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,” arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Kaidi, E

    J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs a nd anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,” JHEP 10 (2023) 053 , arXiv:2301.07112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Antinucci, F

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Anomalie s of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,” arXiv:2308.11707 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Non-invertible symme tries in finite group gauge theory,

    C. Cordova, D. B. Costa, and P.-S. Hsin, “Non-invertible symme tries in finite group gauge theory,” arXiv:2407.07964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,

    T. D. Brennan, C. Cordova, and T. T. Dumitrescu, “Line Defec t Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,” arXiv:2206.15401 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,

    D. G. Delmastro, J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, and Z. Komargodski, “Ano malies and symmetry fractionalization,” SciPost Phys. 15 no. 3, (2023) 079 , arXiv:2206.15118 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    On 2-Group Global Symmetries and Their Anomalies

    F. Benini, C. C´ ordova, and P.-S. Hsin, “On 2-Group Global Symm etries and their Anomalies,” JHEP 03 (2019) 118 , arXiv:1803.09336 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 11, (2022) 111601 , arXiv:2111.01141 [hep-th] . 36

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Copetti, M

    C. Copetti, M. Del Zotto, K. Ohmori, and Y. Wang, “Higher Stru cture of Chiral Symmetry,” arXiv:2305.18282 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Noninvertible Global Symmet ries in the Standard Model,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible Global Symmet ries in the Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 16, (2022) 161601 , arXiv:2205.05086 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, “Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and E xponential Hierarchies,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 1, (2023) 011034 , arXiv:2205.06243 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Non-Invertible Duality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non invertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) 125016 , arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries in (3+1)d,

    C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, and C. Zhang, “Anomalies of Non-Inver tible Symmetries in (3+1)d,” arXiv:2308.11706 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, “Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,” JHEP 07 (2024) 051 , arXiv:2106.12577 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Non-invertible Condensation, Du- ality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non -invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 402 no. 1, (2023) 489–542 , arXiv:2204.09025 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Self-$G$-ality in 1+1 dimensions

    T. Ando, “A journey on self- G-ality,” arXiv:2405.15648 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Exploring G-ality defects in 2-dim QFTs,

    D.-C. Lu, Z. Sun, and Z. Zhang, “Exploring G-ality defects in 2-dim QFTs,” arXiv:2406.12151 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “Kramers -Wannier duality from conformal defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 070601 , arXiv:cond-mat/0404051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  72. [72]

    Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “Duality an d defects in rational conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 763 (2007) 354–430 , arXiv:hep-th/0607247

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  73. [73]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topolog ical Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,” JHEP 01 (2019) 026 , arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Kaidi, G

    J. Kaidi, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification,” JHEP 08 (2022) 053 , arXiv:2205.01104 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, “Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases,” JHEP 04 (2024) 132 , arXiv:1912.02817 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Y amagami Fusion 2-Categories,

    T. D. D´ ecoppet and M. Yu, “Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Y amagami Fusion 2-Categories,” arXiv:2306.08117 [math.CT]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Non-Invertible Surface Defects in 2+1d QFTs from Half Spacetime Gauging,

    W. Cui, B. Haghighat, and L. Ruggeri, “Non-Invertible Surface Defects in 2+1d QFTs from Half Spacetime Gauging,” arXiv:2406.09261 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Sun and Y

    Z. Sun and Y. Zheng, “When are Duality Defects Group-Theore tical?,” arXiv:2307.14428 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Notes on gw oper ators and ty symmetry,

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Notes on gw oper ators and ty symmetry,” In progress (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Obstructions to gapped phases from noninvertible symmetries,

    A. Apte, C. Cordova, and H. T. Lam, “Obstructions to gapped phases from noninvertible symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 108 no. 4, (2023) 045134 , arXiv:2212.14605 [hep-th] . 37

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.