Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.07069 v2 pith:23AVWOFD submitted 2023-01-17 cs.CL cs.LG

Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Study

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords promptingexamplesprompttranslationperformancedatamachinemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Research on prompting has shown excellent performance with little or even no supervised training across many tasks. However, prompting for machine translation is still under-explored in the literature. We fill this gap by offering a systematic study on prompting strategies for translation, examining various factors for prompt template and demonstration example selection. We further explore the use of monolingual data and the feasibility of cross-lingual, cross-domain, and sentence-to-document transfer learning in prompting. Extensive experiments with GLM-130B (Zeng et al., 2022) as the testbed show that 1) the number and the quality of prompt examples matter, where using suboptimal examples degenerates translation; 2) several features of prompt examples, such as semantic similarity, show significant Spearman correlation with their prompting performance; yet, none of the correlations are strong enough; 3) using pseudo parallel prompt examples constructed from monolingual data via zero-shot prompting could improve translation; and 4) improved performance is achievable by transferring knowledge from prompt examples selected in other settings. We finally provide an analysis on the model outputs and discuss several problems that prompting still suffers from.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring Concreteness Through a Figurative Lens

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLMs compress concreteness into a consistent 1D direction in mid-to-late layers that separates literal from figurative noun uses and supports efficient classification plus steering.

  2. Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study

    cs.SE 2023-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Jailbreak prompts grouped into ten patterns and three categories successfully evade ChatGPT restrictions across 40 scenarios using 3,120 test questions.

  3. Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Local LLMs via Ollama match or exceed some local NMT systems and a frontier LLM on a new multilingual corpus but lag behind top commercial NMTs like DeepL.