Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evidence for the decay Ω_(c)⁰ to π^+Ω(2012)^- to π^+ (bar{K}Xi)⁻

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.00892 v1 pith:NTVEK5K7 submitted 2021-06-02 hep-ex hep-ph

Evidence for the decay Ω_(c)⁰ to π^+Ω(2012)^- to π^+ (bar{K}Xi)⁻

Belle Collaboration: Y. Li , S. S. Tang , S. Jia , C. P. Shen , I. Adachi , H. Aihara , S. Al Said , D. M. Asner
show 184 more authors
H. Atmacan V. Aulchenko T. Aushev R. Ayad V. Babu S. Bahinipati P. Behera M. Bessner T. Bilka J. Biswal A. Bozek M. Bra\v{c}ko P. Branchini T. E. Browder A. Budano M. Campajola D. \v{C}ervenkov M.-C. Chang P. Chang V. Chekelian A. Chen B. G. Cheon K. Chilikin H. E. Cho K. Cho S.-J. Cho Y. Choi S. Choudhury D. Cinabro S. Cunliffe S. Das N. Dash G. De Nardo G. De Pietro F. Di Capua Z. Dole\v{z}al T. V. Dong D. Epifanov T. Ferber B. G. Fulsom R. Garg V. Gaur A. Giri P. Goldenzweig B. Golob E. Graziani T. Gu K. Gudkova C. Hadjivasiliou S. Halder K. Hayasaka H. Hayashii W.-S. Hou K. Inami A. Ishikawa M. Iwasaki Y. Iwasaki W. W. Jacobs E.-J. Jang Y. Jin K. K. Joo K. H. Kang G. Karyan C. Kiesling C. H. Kim D. Y. Kim K.-H. Kim S. H. Kim Y.-K. Kim K. Kinoshita P. Kody\v{s} T. Konno A. Korobov S. Korpar E. Kovalenko P. Kri\v{z}an R. Kroeger P. Krokovny T. Kuhr M. Kumar K. Kumara A. Kuzmin Y.-J. Kwon K. Lalwani M. Laurenza S. C. Lee C. H. Li L. K. Li L. Li Gioi J. Libby K. Lieret D. Liventsev M. Masuda T. Matsuda D. Matvienko J. T. McNeil M. Merola K. Miyabayashi R. Mizuk G. B. Mohanty T. Mori R. Mussa M. Nakao Z. Natkaniec A. Natochii L. Nayak M. Nayak M. Niiyama N. K. Nisar S. Nishida K. Nishimura H. Ono Y. Onuki P. Oskin P. Pakhlov G. Pakhlova S. Pardi S.-H. Park A. Passeri S. Paul T. K. Pedlar R. Pestotnik L. E. Piilonen T. Podobnik V. Popov E. Prencipe M. T. Prim N. Rout G. Russo D. Sahoo Y. Sakai S. Sandilya A. Sangal L. Santelj T. Sanuki V. Savinov G. Schnell C. Schwanda Y. Seino K. Senyo M. Shapkin C. Sharma V. Shebalin J.-G. Shiu A. Sokolov E. Solovieva M. Stari\v{c} Z. S. Stottler M. Sumihama T. Sumiyoshi W. Sutcliffe M. Takizawa K. Tanida F. Tenchini K. Trabelsi M. Uchida T. Uglov Y. Unno K. Uno S. Uno Y. Usov S. E. Vahsen R. Van Tonder G. Varner A. Vinokurova E. Waheed C. H. Wang E. Wang M.-Z. Wang P. Wang S. Watanuki O. Werbycka E. Won B. D. Yabsley W. Yan S. B. Yang H. Ye J. Yelton J. H. Yin C. Z. Yuan Y. Yusa Z. P. Zhang V. Zhilich V. Zhukova
This is my paper
classification hep-ex hep-ph
keywords omegastatsystbranchingevidencetimesasymmetric-energybelle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using a data sample of 980~fb$^{-1}$ collected with the Belle detector operating at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider, we present evidence for the $\Omega(2012)^-$ in the resonant substructure of $\Omega_{c}^{0} \to \pi^+ (\bar{K}\Xi)^{-}$ ($(\bar{K}\Xi)^{-}$ = $K^-\Xi^0$ + $\bar{K}^0 \Xi^-$) decays. The significance of the $\Omega(2012)^-$ signal is 4.2$\sigma$ after considering the systematic uncertainties. The ratio of the branching fraction of $\Omega_{c}^{0} \to \pi^{+} \Omega(2012)^- \to \pi^+ (\bar{K}\Xi)^{-}$ relative to that of $\Omega_{c}^{0} \to \pi^{+} \Omega^-$ is calculated to be 0.220 $\pm$ 0.059(stat.) $\pm$ 0.035(syst.). The individual ratios of the branching fractions of the two isospin modes are also determined, and found to be ${\cal B}(\Omega_{c}^0 \to \pi^+ \Omega(2012)^-) \times {\cal B}(\Omega(2012)^- \to K^-\Xi^0)/{\cal B}(\Omega_{c}^0 \to \pi^+ K^- \Xi^0)$ = (9.6 $\pm$ 3.2(stat.) $\pm$ 1.8(syst.))\% and ${\cal B}(\Omega_{c}^0 \to \pi^+ \Omega(2012)^-) \times {\cal B}(\Omega(2012)^- \to \bar{K}^0 \Xi^-)/{\cal B}(\Omega_{c}^0 \to \pi^+ \bar{K}^0 \Xi^-)$ = (5.5 $\pm$ 2.8(stat.) $\pm$ 0.7(syst.))\%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the $\Omega(2012)$, $\Omega(2380)$, and $\Omega_c(3120)$ via femtoscopy correlation functions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Correlation function calculations with coupled-channel potentials produce low-momentum enhancements that the authors interpret as signatures of the molecular structure of Ω(2012), Ω(2380), and Ωc(3120).

  2. Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the $\Omega(2012)$, $\Omega(2380)$, and $\Omega_c(3120)$ via femtoscopy correlation functions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical correlation functions computed from effective potentials exhibit enhancements that indicate the hadronic molecular nature of the Ω(2012), Ω(2380), and Ωc(3120) resonances.