Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Adversarial Robustness via Attention and Adversarial Logit Pairing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.11435 v2 pith:3LZ3TEMB submitted 2019-08-23 cs.LG cs.CReess.IV

Improving Adversarial Robustness via Attention and Adversarial Logit Pairing

classification cs.LG cs.CReess.IV
keywords adversarialexamplesattackattentionlogitaccuracyachievesdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Though deep neural networks have achieved the state of the art performance in visual classification, recent studies have shown that they are all vulnerable to the attack of adversarial examples. In this paper, we develop improved techniques for defending against adversarial examples. First, we propose an enhanced defense technique denoted Attention and Adversarial Logit Pairing(AT+ALP), which encourages both attention map and logit for the pairs of examples to be similar. When being applied to clean examples and their adversarial counterparts, AT+ALP improves accuracy on adversarial examples over adversarial training. We show that AT+ALP can effectively increase the average activations of adversarial examples in the key area and demonstrate that it focuses on discriminate features to improve the robustness of the model. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments using a wide range of datasets and the experiment results show that our AT+ALP achieves the state of the art defense performance. For example, on 17 Flower Category Database, under strong 200-iteration PGD gray-box and black-box attacks where prior art has 34% and 39% accuracy, our method achieves 50% and 51%. Compared with previous work, our work is evaluated under highly challenging PGD attack: the maximum perturbation $\epsilon \in \{0.25,0.5\}$ i.e. $L_\infty \in \{0.25,0.5\}$ with 10 to 200 attack iterations. To the best of our knowledge, such a strong attack has not been previously explored on a wide range of datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.