REVIEW 1 cited by
White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference
read the original abstract
Membership inference determines, given a sample and trained parameters of a machine learning model, whether the sample was part of the training set. In this paper, we derive the optimal strategy for membership inference with a few assumptions on the distribution of the parameters. We show that optimal attacks only depend on the loss function, and thus black-box attacks are as good as white-box attacks. As the optimal strategy is not tractable, we provide approximations of it leading to several inference methods, and show that existing membership inference methods are coarser approximations of this optimal strategy. Our membership attacks outperform the state of the art in various settings, ranging from a simple logistic regression to more complex architectures and datasets, such as ResNet-101 and Imagenet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
idSCD: Identifying Training Datasets through Semantic Correlation Descriptors
idSCD uses semantic correlation descriptors to perform dataset membership inference by comparing learned semantic structures, outperforming baselines in NLI, emotion, and medical text experiments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.