Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Interpreting the distributions of FRB observables

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.00755 v1 pith:XJIDSOPK submitted 2019-05-02 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

Interpreting the distributions of FRB observables

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM
keywords distributionsdetectionfrbsobservedresolutionbeendiscusseffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are short-duration radio transients of unknown origin. Thus far, they have been blindly detected at millisecond timescales with dispersion measures (DMs) between 110--2600\,pc\,cm$^{-3}$. However, the observed pulse width, DM, and even brightness distributions depend strongly on the time and frequency resolution of the detection instrument. Spectral and temporal resolution also significantly affect FRB detection rates, similar to beam size and system-equivalent flux density (SEFD). I discuss the interplay between underlying FRB properties and instrumental response, and provide a generic formalism for calculating the \textit{observed} distributions of parameters given an intrinsic FRB distribution, focusing on pulse width and DM. I argue that if there exist many FRBs of duration $<<$\,1\,ms (as with giant pulses from Galactic pulsars) or events with high DM, they are being missed due to the deleterious effects of smearing. I outline how to optimise spectral and temporal resolution for FRB surveys that are throughput-limited. I also investigate how such effects may have been imprinted on the distributions of FRBs at real telescopes, like the different observed DMs at ASKAP and Parkes. Finally, I discuss the impact of intrinsic correlations between FRB parameters on detection statistics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Updating the PATH framework with FRB host galaxy models

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0

    PATH is extended with three fitted P(m_r|z) prior models combined with P(z|DM), raising host-association confidence for ASKAP FRBs while showing fainter-than-expected host magnitude distribution.

  2. A series of unfortunate events: CHIME/FRB misclassification of a Galactic pulsar as a periodic fast radio burst

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 accept novelty 2.0

    A reported periodic fast radio burst is reclassified as Galactic pulsar emission due to CHIME calibration and beam-pointing error.

  3. Fast Radio Burst Injection Tests

    astro-ph.IM 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    All missed high-S/N FRB injections from the Molonglo search are explained by noise, labeling errors, analysis cuts, S/N miscalculations, and RFI with no fundamental pipeline failure required.