Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Causal Reasoning from Meta-reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.08162 v1 pith:XVIH27FI submitted 2019-01-23 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

Causal Reasoning from Meta-reinforcement Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords causalreasoninglearningreinforcementagentagentsheremeta-reinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Discovering and exploiting the causal structure in the environment is a crucial challenge for intelligent agents. Here we explore whether causal reasoning can emerge via meta-reinforcement learning. We train a recurrent network with model-free reinforcement learning to solve a range of problems that each contain causal structure. We find that the trained agent can perform causal reasoning in novel situations in order to obtain rewards. The agent can select informative interventions, draw causal inferences from observational data, and make counterfactual predictions. Although established formal causal reasoning algorithms also exist, in this paper we show that such reasoning can arise from model-free reinforcement learning, and suggest that causal reasoning in complex settings may benefit from the more end-to-end learning-based approaches presented here. This work also offers new strategies for structured exploration in reinforcement learning, by providing agents with the ability to perform -- and interpret -- experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NoisyCausal: A Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Under Structured Noise

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NoisyCausal benchmark tests LLMs on causal reasoning with structured noise, and a modular LLM-plus-causal-graph framework outperforms baselines while generalizing to Cladder.