Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.05679 v3 pith:UYJLYPQG submitted 2018-09-15 cs.CL cs.AI

Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classification

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords textclassificationgraphconvolutionalwordnetworksdocumentembeddings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text classification is an important and classical problem in natural language processing. There have been a number of studies that applied convolutional neural networks (convolution on regular grid, e.g., sequence) to classification. However, only a limited number of studies have explored the more flexible graph convolutional neural networks (convolution on non-grid, e.g., arbitrary graph) for the task. In this work, we propose to use graph convolutional networks for text classification. We build a single text graph for a corpus based on word co-occurrence and document word relations, then learn a Text Graph Convolutional Network (Text GCN) for the corpus. Our Text GCN is initialized with one-hot representation for word and document, it then jointly learns the embeddings for both words and documents, as supervised by the known class labels for documents. Our experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that a vanilla Text GCN without any external word embeddings or knowledge outperforms state-of-the-art methods for text classification. On the other hand, Text GCN also learns predictive word and document embeddings. In addition, experimental results show that the improvement of Text GCN over state-of-the-art comparison methods become more prominent as we lower the percentage of training data, suggesting the robustness of Text GCN to less training data in text classification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Graph Star Net for Generalized Multi-Task Learning

    cs.SI 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GraphStar is a new GNN that adds star nodes and relay attention to achieve non-local representations for node, graph, and link tasks, claiming 2-5% gains over prior SOTA on benchmarks.

  2. Gated Multi-Graph Fusion via Graph Attention Networks for Alzheimer's Disease Detection

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A gated fusion of graph attention networks on semantic, dependency, and co-occurrence graphs from speech achieves 90% accuracy for Alzheimer's detection on the ADReSSo dataset.

  3. BiMind: A Dual-Head Reasoning Model with Attention-Geometry Adapter for Incorrect Information Detection

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    BiMind outperforms existing methods in incorrect information detection by disentangling content and knowledge reasoning with attention geometry adaptation and self-retrieval.