Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generalization Error in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.01174 v3 pith:67AG3CF4 submitted 2018-08-03 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

Generalization Error in Deep Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords deepgeneralizationerrorlearningnetworksneuralperformancespeech
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning models have lately shown great performance in various fields such as computer vision, speech recognition, speech translation, and natural language processing. However, alongside their state-of-the-art performance, it is still generally unclear what is the source of their generalization ability. Thus, an important question is what makes deep neural networks able to generalize well from the training set to new data. In this article, we provide an overview of the existing theory and bounds for the characterization of the generalization error of deep neural networks, combining both classical and more recent theoretical and empirical results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Induced Norms of Matrices and Grothendieck problems

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analytic framework yields exact induced norms ||A||_{q→r} for key matrix classes and exact values for associated Grothendieck problems.