Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PHD-GIFs: Personalized Highlight Detection for Automatic GIF Creation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.06604 v2 pith:4VQVMQ5H submitted 2018-04-18 cs.CV cs.MM

PHD-GIFs: Personalized Highlight Detection for Automatic GIF Creation

classification cs.CV cs.MM
keywords modeluserhighlightdetectionimprovesinterestsmodelspersonalized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Highlight detection models are typically trained to identify cues that make visual content appealing or interesting for the general public, with the objective of reducing a video to such moments. However, the "interestingness" of a video segment or image is subjective. Thus, such highlight models provide results of limited relevance for the individual user. On the other hand, training one model per user is inefficient and requires large amounts of personal information which is typically not available. To overcome these limitations, we present a global ranking model which conditions on each particular user's interests. Rather than training one model per user, our model is personalized via its inputs, which allows it to effectively adapt its predictions, given only a few user-specific examples. To train this model, we create a large-scale dataset of users and the GIFs they created, giving us an accurate indication of their interests. Our experiments show that using the user history substantially improves the prediction accuracy. On our test set of 850 videos, our model improves the recall by 8% with respect to generic highlight detectors. Furthermore, our method proves more precise than the user-agnostic baselines even with just one person-specific example.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Personal Salience: Highlighting Is Social, but Individuality Lives in Selection

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Highlighting is largely social (crowd predicts salience better than personal history), but individuality appears strongly in which salient passages a person selects, driven by thematic preferences.