REVIEW 2 cited by
Interactive Attention Networks for Aspect-Level Sentiment Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Interactive Attention Networks for Aspect-Level Sentiment Classification
read the original abstract
Aspect-level sentiment classification aims at identifying the sentiment polarity of specific target in its context. Previous approaches have realized the importance of targets in sentiment classification and developed various methods with the goal of precisely modeling their contexts via generating target-specific representations. However, these studies always ignore the separate modeling of targets. In this paper, we argue that both targets and contexts deserve special treatment and need to be learned their own representations via interactive learning. Then, we propose the interactive attention networks (IAN) to interactively learn attentions in the contexts and targets, and generate the representations for targets and contexts separately. With this design, the IAN model can well represent a target and its collocative context, which is helpful to sentiment classification. Experimental results on SemEval 2014 Datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LASQ: A Low-resource Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple Extraction Dataset
LASQ is a new quadruple extraction dataset for Uzbek and Uyghur that includes a syntax-aware model showing gains over baselines on the task.
-
Which Review Aspect Has a Greater Impact on the Duration of Open Peer Review in Multiple Rounds? -- Evidence from Nature Communications
Sentiment analysis of peer review reports finds weak negative correlation between positive sentiment on evaluation/results aspects and shorter review duration, varying by round.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.