Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.03814 v3 pith:QSUJPPNY submitted 2017-02-13 cs.AI cs.CL

Bilateral Multi-Perspective Matching for Natural Language Sentences

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords matchingmodelsentencesentenceslanguagenaturaltasksbilateral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Natural language sentence matching is a fundamental technology for a variety of tasks. Previous approaches either match sentences from a single direction or only apply single granular (word-by-word or sentence-by-sentence) matching. In this work, we propose a bilateral multi-perspective matching (BiMPM) model under the "matching-aggregation" framework. Given two sentences $P$ and $Q$, our model first encodes them with a BiLSTM encoder. Next, we match the two encoded sentences in two directions $P \rightarrow Q$ and $P \leftarrow Q$. In each matching direction, each time step of one sentence is matched against all time-steps of the other sentence from multiple perspectives. Then, another BiLSTM layer is utilized to aggregate the matching results into a fix-length matching vector. Finally, based on the matching vector, the decision is made through a fully connected layer. We evaluate our model on three tasks: paraphrase identification, natural language inference and answer sentence selection. Experimental results on standard benchmark datasets show that our model achieves the state-of-the-art performance on all tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Should We Still Pretrain Encoders with Masked Language Modeling?

    cs.CL 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Controlled ablations of 38 models find MLM superior to CLM on representation benchmarks while CLM offers better data efficiency and stability; a biphasic CLM-then-MLM schedule is optimal under fixed compute and improv...

  2. Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generation

    cs.CL 2023-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Semantic entropy improves uncertainty estimation in natural language generation by incorporating semantic equivalences, outperforming standard entropy baselines on predicting model accuracy for question answering.

  3. To Tune or Not To Tune? How About the Best of Both Worlds?

    cs.CL 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A sequential fine-tuning strategy for pre-trained language models reports modest accuracy gains of 4.7%, 0.99%, and 0.72% on semantic similarity, sequence labeling, and text classification tasks.