REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum Adiabatic Algorithms, Small Gaps, and Different Paths
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantum Adiabatic Algorithms, Small Gaps, and Different Paths
read the original abstract
We construct a set of instances of 3SAT which are not solved efficiently using the simplest quantum adiabatic algorithm. These instances are obtained by picking random clauses all consistent with two disparate planted solutions and then penalizing one of them with a single additional clause. We argue that by randomly modifying the beginning Hamiltonian, one obtains (with substantial probability) an adiabatic path that removes this difficulty. This suggests that the quantum adiabatic algorithm should in general be run on each instance with many different random paths leading to the problem Hamiltonian. We do not know whether this trick will help for a random instance of 3SAT (as opposed to an instance from the particular set we consider), especially if the instance has an exponential number of disparate assignments that violate few clauses. We use a continuous imaginary time Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm in a novel way to numerically investigate the ground state as well as the first excited state of our system. Our arguments are supplemented by Quantum Monte Carlo data from simulations with up to 150 spins.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A fidelity metric for quantum annealing benchmarked by extreme scaling quantum Monte-Carlo simulations
Introduces an equation-of-state accuracy metric ε for quantum annealing and benchmarks it via large-scale variational and Green-function quantum Monte Carlo simulations on Rydberg systems, reporting ε values of 10^{-2...
-
Hybrid Real-Imaginary Time Evolution for Low-Depth Hamiltonian Simulation in Quantum Optimization
HAVQDS achieves higher approximation ratios on 6-14 qubit SK instances than adiabatic or CD methods while cutting CNOT counts by 1-2 orders of magnitude.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.