Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 65 references

Precision electroweak data constrains neutrinophilic scalar couplings via corrections to the Fermi constant.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 13:23 UTC pith:LAPPGXAB

load-bearing objection The paper's main addition is spotting an overlooked neutrino charged-current correction that supplies the leading electroweak bound on neutrinophilic scalars above a few hundred MeV.

arxiv 2606.02704 v1 pith:LAPPGXAB submitted 2026-06-01 hep-ph

Precision Electroweak Constraints on Neutrinophilic Scalars

Saeid Foroughi-Abari , Camilla Mupo , Drona Vatsyayan , Yue Zhang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords neutrinophilic scalarneutrino self-interactionelectroweak precisionradiative correctionsFermi constantΔr parameterUV completion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives bounds on neutrinophilic scalars that mediate strong neutrino self-interactions by calculating their effects on electroweak precision observables. It identifies that radiative corrections to the neutrino charged-current coupling modify the Δr parameter and Fermi constant measurements, supplying the dominant limit for mediator masses above a few hundred MeV. The analysis begins in a simplified model where corrections are fixed by gauge invariance, then tests the same limits in a UV-complete model that adds a TeV-scale SU(2)_L triplet scalar. The work shows the simplified-model results remain reliable over wide parameter ranges while flagging where heavy-particle loops start to matter.

Core claim

The neutrino charged-current coupling correction and its impact on the Δr parameter and Fermi constant measurements allows derivation of the leading constraint on the neutrinophilic couplings for mediator mass above a few hundred MeV. These constraints hold in a concrete UV completion with a TeV-scale SU(2)_L triplet scalar for a wide range of parameter space, with identification of when heavy particle loop contributions become non-negligible.

What carries the argument

Radiative correction to the neutrino charged-current coupling induced by the neutrinophilic scalar, which shifts the effective Fermi constant and the Δr parameter.

Load-bearing premise

Finite radiative corrections in the simplified model can be obtained reliably with the guidance of gauge invariance, and heavy-particle loop contributions in the UV-complete model remain negligible across a wide range of parameter space.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the Fermi constant or the Δr parameter that deviates from the Standard Model expectation in a manner inconsistent with the size of the charged-current correction calculated for a given neutrinophilic coupling and mediator mass.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The leading bounds apply to the neutrinophilic coupling strength for scalar masses from a few hundred MeV upward.
  • Electroweak constraints complement existing cosmological and astrophysical limits on neutrino self-interactions.
  • Simplified-model results remain valid in the UV completion with a TeV-scale triplet whenever heavy-loop effects stay small.
  • Specific conditions are isolated under which the full UV model produces additional contributions beyond the simplified case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These electroweak bounds may tighten interpretations of neutrino self-interactions in cosmological settings such as structure formation or Hubble-tension resolutions.
  • Future collider measurements of weak parameters could directly test or strengthen the derived limits.
  • Analogous radiative-correction analyses could be applied to other neutrino-coupled mediators in beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives precision electroweak constraints on neutrinophilic scalars that mediate active-neutrino self-interactions. In a simplified model the authors obtain finite radiative corrections guided by gauge invariance; they identify a previously overlooked correction to the neutrino charged-current vertex that modifies the Δr parameter and the extracted Fermi constant, yielding the leading bound on the neutrinophilic coupling for mediator masses above a few hundred MeV. Robustness is checked in a concrete UV completion containing a TeV-scale SU(2)_L triplet scalar, where the simplified-model limits remain valid over a wide parameter space except in regions where heavy-particle loops become non-negligible.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies an important missing constraint on a well-motivated class of neutrino self-interaction models by exploiting established electroweak precision observables. The explicit construction of finite corrections via gauge invariance and the direct comparison with a UV-complete model, including identification of the parameter region where heavy loops remain subdominant, constitute clear strengths that increase the reliability of the reported bounds.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2: the logarithmic enhancement of the radiative correction for small mediator masses is stated but the precise range of validity (e.g., relative to the electroweak scale) is not quantified; an explicit inequality would clarify the domain of the leading constraint.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4: the caption does not indicate whether the shaded exclusion regions include the 1σ or 2σ uncertainty on the input electroweak observables; adding this information would improve interpretability.
  3. The notation for the neutrinophilic scalar field (φ versus ϕ) is used inconsistently between the simplified model and the UV completion; a single symbol throughout would reduce confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee summary accurately captures the key elements of our work on electroweak constraints for neutrinophilic scalars.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation uses external electroweak observables; no reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The central derivation computes one-loop corrections to the neutrino charged-current coupling in a simplified model (guided by gauge invariance) and maps them onto the established Δr parameter and G_F measurements. These observables are independent external inputs, not quantities defined or fitted inside the model. The UV-completion check explicitly verifies when heavy-loop contributions remain subdominant rather than assuming the result. No equation reduces to a prior fit, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms beyond the stated use of gauge invariance are extractable.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gauge invariance guides the finite radiative corrections in the simplified model.
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract to obtain the corrections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1122 out tokens · 33620 ms · 2026-06-28T13:23:47.791751+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Strong self-interaction among the active neutrinos mediated by a neutrinophilic scalar is a well-motivated target of particle physics and cosmological probes. In this article, we present precision electroweak constraints on models for neutrino self-interaction. We first work in the simplified model where the finite radiative corrections are obtained with the guidance of gauge invariance. These corrections are logarithmically enhanced for small mediator masses. We point out the importance of neutrino charged-current coupling correction and its impact on the $\Delta r$ parameter and Fermi constant measurements. This effect was overlooked previously and allows us to derive the leading constraint on the neutrinophilic couplings for mediator mass above a few hundred MeV. We investigate the robustness of the result in a concrete UV completion which further includes a TeV-scale $SU(2)_L$ triplet scalar and find the simplified model constraints continue to hold for a wide range of parameter space. We pin down moving parts in the UV complete model and conditions when the contributions from heavy particle loops are no longer negligible. Our results serve as a useful road map for future explorations of the self-interacting neutrino paradigm.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kreisch, F.-Y

    C.D. Kreisch, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and O. Doré,Neutrino puzzle: Anomalies, interactions, and cosmological tensions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123505 [1902.00534]

    work page arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Das and S

    A. Das and S. Ghosh,Flavor-specific interaction favors strong neutrino self-coupling in the early universe,JCAP07(2021) 038 [2011.12315]

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    A. He, R. An, M.M. Ivanov and V. Gluscevic,Self-interacting neutrinos in light of large-scale structure data,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 103527 [2309.03956]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Camarena, F.-Y

    D. Camarena, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and J. Houghteling,Confronting self-interacting neutrinos with the full shape of the galaxy power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103535 [2309.03941]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Das and S

    A. Das and S. Ghosh,The magnificent ACT of flavor-specific neutrino self-interaction, JCAP09(2023) 042 [2303.08843]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Camarena and F.-Y

    D. Camarena and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine,Absence of concordance in a simple self-interacting neutrino cosmology,2403.05496

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    S. Pal, R. Samanta and S. Pal,Exploring neutrino interactions in light of present and upcoming galaxy survey,2409.03712

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Racco, P

    D. Racco, P. Zhang and H. Zheng,Neutrino masses from large-scale structures: future sensitivity and theory dependence,2412.04959

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    De Gouvêa, M

    A. De Gouvêa, M. Sen, W. Tangarife and Y. Zhang,Dodelson-Widrow Mechanism in the Presence of Self-Interacting Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 081802 [1910.04901]. – 31 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Kelly, M

    K.J. Kelly, M. Sen, W. Tangarife and Y. Zhang,Origin of sterile neutrino dark matter via secret neutrino interactions with vector bosons,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 115031 [2005.03681]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Kelly, M

    K.J. Kelly, M. Sen and Y. Zhang,Intimate Relationship between Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter and∆Neff,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 041101 [2011.02487]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    R. An, V. Gluscevic, E.O. Nadler and Y. Zhang,Can Neutrino Self-interactions Save Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter?,Astrophys. J. Lett.954(2023) L18 [2301.08299]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Benso, T

    C. Benso, T. Schwetz and D. Vatsyayan,Large neutrino mass in cosmology and keV sterile neutrino dark matter from a dark sector,JCAP04(2025) 054 [2410.23926]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Parashari, V

    P. Parashari, V. Gluscevic, Y. Zhang, S. Bird, M.M. Ivanov and A. He,Lyαforest bounds on sterile neutrino production via neutrino self-interactions,2602.17821

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Hunting All the Hidden Photons,

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel,Hunting All the Hidden Photons,JHEP07(2018) 094 [1803.05466]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Ferber, A

    T. Ferber, A. Grohsjean and F. Kahlhoefer,Dark Higgs bosons at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.136(2024) 104105 [2305.16169]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    R. Laha, B. Dasgupta and J.F. Beacom,Constraints on New Neutrino Interactions via Light Abelian Vector Bosons,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 093025 [1304.3460]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Berryman et al.,Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys

    J.M. Berryman et al.,Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101267 [2203.01955]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Lepton-Number-Charged Scalars and Neutrino Beamstrahlung

    J.M. Berryman, A. De Gouvêa, K.J. Kelly and Y. Zhang,Lepton-Number-Charged Scalars and Neutrino Beamstrahlung,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075030 [1802.00009]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Hollik,Radiative Corrections in the Standard Model and their Role for Precision Tests of the Electroweak Theory,Fortsch

    W.F.L. Hollik,Radiative Corrections in the Standard Model and their Role for Precision Tests of the Electroweak Theory,Fortsch. Phys.38(1990) 165

    1990

  21. [21]

    TeV Symmetry and the Little Hierarchy Problem

    H.-C. Cheng and I. Low,TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem,JHEP09(2003) 051 [hep-ph/0308199]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  22. [22]

    Low Energy Precision Test of Supersymmetry

    M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and S. Su,Low Energy Precision Test of Supersymmetry,Phys. Rept. 456(2008) 1 [hep-ph/0612057]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Haller, A

    J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, T. Peiffer and J. Stelzer,Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 675 [1803.01853]

    work page arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Harigaya, E

    K. Harigaya, E. Petrosky and A. Pierce,Precision electroweak tensions and a dark photon, JHEP07(2024) 201 [2307.13045]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Electroweak precision constraints on dark photon models with generalized mixing,

    E. Bertuzzo, C. Csaki and F. Huller,Electroweak Precision Constraints on Dark Photon Models with Generalized Mixing,2507.16888. [26]PIENUcollaboration,Search for three body pion decaysπ +→l+νX,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 052006 [2101.07381]. – 32 – [27]NA62collaboration,Search forK + decays to a muon and invisible particles,Phys. Lett. B 816(2021) 136259 [2101.12304]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Esteban, S

    I. Esteban, S. Pandey, V. Brdar and J.F. Beacom,Probing secret interactions of astrophysical neutrinos in the high-statistics era,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123014 [2107.13568]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Foroughi-Abari, K.J

    S. Foroughi-Abari, K.J. Kelly and Y. Zhang,Radiative Correction from Secret Neutrino Interactions and Implications for Neutrino-Scattering Experiments,2510.15023

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Zhang,Neutrino self-interaction and weak mixing-angle measurements,Phys

    Y. Zhang,Neutrino self-interaction and weak mixing-angle measurements,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 035027 [2411.05070]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Revisiting the Global Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model and Beyond with Gfitter

    H. Flacher, M. Goebel, J. Haller, A. Hocker, K. Monig and J. Stelzer,Revisiting the Global Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model and Beyond with Gfitter,Eur. Phys. J. C60(2009) 543 [0811.0009]. [32]Gfittercollaboration,Updated Status of the Global Electroweak Fit and Constraints on New Physics,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 2003 [1107.0975]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    Fermi Constants and ``New Physics''

    W.J. Marciano,Fermi constants and ’New Physics’,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 093006 [hep-ph/9903451]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    Sirlin,Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,Phys

    A. Sirlin,Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 971

    1980

  32. [32]

    Low Energy Tests of the Weak Interaction

    J. Erler and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Low energy tests of the weak interaction,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.54(2005) 351 [hep-ph/0404291]. [36]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Hea vy Fla vour Groupcollaboration,Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance,Phys. Rept.427(2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008]. [37]SLDc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  33. [33]

    Marciano and A

    W.J. Marciano and A. Sirlin,Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2695

    1980

  34. [34]

    Relation between $\sin^2\hat{\theta}_W(m_Z)$ and $\sin^2\theta_{eff}^{lep}$

    P. Gambino and A. Sirlin,Relation between sin**2 Theta-w (m(z)) and sin**2 Theta-effective (leptonic),Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 1160 [hep-ph/9309326]. [40]CDF, D0collaboration,Tevatron Run II combination of the effective leptonic electroweak mixing angle,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 112007 [1801.06283]. [41]ATLAScollaboration,Measurement of the effective leptonic weak...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [35]

    Foroughi-Abari, K.J

    S. Foroughi-Abari, K.J. Kelly, M. Rai and Y. Zhang,Enabling Strong Neutrino Self-Interaction with an Unparticle Mediator,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 181001 [2501.02049]. [45]CDFcollaboration,Precise measurement of theW-boson mass with the CDF II detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 151803 [1203.0275]. [46]D0collaboration,Measurement of the W Boson Mass with ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    G.-C. Cho, K. Hagiwara, Y. Matsumoto and D. Nomura,The MSSM confronts the precision electroweak data and the muon g-2,JHEP11(2011) 068 [1104.1769]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  37. [37]

    Brdar, M

    V. Brdar, M. Lindner, S. Vogl and X.-J. Xu,Revisiting neutrino self-interaction constraints fromZandτdecays,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 115001 [2003.05339]. [50]BMWcollaboration,Lattice QCD at the physical point: light quark masses,Phys. Lett. B 701(2011) 265 [1011.2403]. [51]Fermilab Lattice, MILC, TUMQCDcollaboration,Up-, down-, strange-, charm-, and bottom-q...

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Awramik, M

    M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas and G. Weiglein,Precise Prediction for the W Boson Mass in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 053006 [hep-ph/0311148]

    work page arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Electroweak two-loop corrections to the effective weak mixing angle

    M. Awramik, M. Czakon and A. Freitas,Electroweak two-loop corrections to the effective weak mixing angle,JHEP11(2006) 048 [hep-ph/0608099]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    Freitas, JHEP04, 070 (2014), 1401.2447

    A. Freitas,Higher-order electroweak corrections to the partial widths and branching ratios of the Z boson,JHEP04(2014) 070 [1401.2447]. [55]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    work page arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    BBN And The CMB Constrain Light, Electromagnetically Coupled WIMPs

    K.M. Nollett and G. Steigman,BBN And The CMB Constrain Light, Electromagnetically Coupled WIMPs,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 083508 [1312.5725]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Li and X.-J

    S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu,Nef f constraints on light mediators coupled to neutrinos: the dilution-resistant effect,JHEP10(2023) 012 [2307.13967]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Barger, W.-Y

    V.D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung and S. Pakvasa,Majoron Emission by Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D 25(1982) 907. – 34 –

    1982

  44. [44]

    Blinov, K.J

    N. Blinov, K.J. Kelly, G.Z. Krnjaic and S.D. McDermott,Constraining the Self-Interacting Neutrino Interpretation of the Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 191102 [1905.02727]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    P.S.B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha and Y. Zhang,New laboratory constraints on neutrinophilic mediators,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139765 [2407.12738]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    de Lima, D

    C.H. de Lima, D. McKeen, J. Ng and D. Tuckler,Hadronic Probes of Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions,2601.06248

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Heintze et al.,A Measurement of the K+ –>e+ Neutrino gamma Structure Decay,Nucl

    J. Heintze et al.,A Measurement of the K+ –>e+ Neutrino gamma Structure Decay,Nucl. Phys. B149(1979) 365. [63]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Leptonic Decays of Charged Pseudoscalar Mesons,

    1979

  48. [48]

    Coloma, M.C

    P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032 [2305.07698]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Kriewald, M

    J. Kriewald, M. Nemevšek and F. Nesti,Enabling precise predictions for left-right symmetry at colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1306 [2403.07756]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) 2227

    1980

  51. [51]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich,Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model,Nucl. Phys. B181(1981) 287

    1981

  52. [52]

    Cheng and L.-F

    T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li,Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) x U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2860

    1980

  53. [53]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 165

    1981

  54. [54]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 774

    1982

  55. [55]

    Type II Seesaw at LHC: the Roadmap

    A. Melfo, M. Nemevsek, F. Nesti, G. Senjanovic and Y. Zhang,Type II Seesaw at LHC: The Roadmap,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 055018 [1108.4416]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Barrie and S.T

    N.D. Barrie and S.T. Petcov,Lepton Flavour Violation tests of Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis, JHEP01(2023) 001 [2210.02110]. [73]ATLAScollaboration,Search for doubly charged Higgs boson production in multi-lepton final states using 139 fb−1 of proton–proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 605 [2211.07505]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Guedes, G

    L. Guedes, G. Hoff, F.S. Queiroz, Y.M. Oviedo-Torres and Y. Villamizar,Search for a Doubly Charged Scalar at the LHC and FCC-hh,2601.00083

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Banerjee, D

    A. Banerjee, D. Das, S. Mukherjee and S. Pandey,Drell-Yan constraints on charged scalars: A weak isospin perspective,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 115014 [2501.09796]. – 35 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Peskin and T

    M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi,A New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector,Phys. Rev. Lett.65(1990) 964

    1990

  60. [60]

    Peskin and T

    M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi,Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 381

    1992

  61. [61]

    Beyond S, T and U

    I. Maksymyk, C.P. Burgess and D. London,Beyond S, T and U,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 529 [hep-ph/9306267]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  62. [62]

    Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in Type II Seesaw Models

    E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma,Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in Type II Seesaw Models,JHEP11(2012) 106 [1209.1303]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Mandal, O.G

    S. Mandal, O.G. Miranda, G. Sanchez Garcia, J.W.F. Valle and X.-J. Xu,Toward deconstructing the simplest seesaw mechanism,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 095020 [2203.06362]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Cheng, X.-G

    Y. Cheng, X.-G. He, F. Huang, J. Sun and Z.-P. Xing,Electroweak precision tests for triplet scalars,Nucl. Phys. B989(2023) 116118 [2208.06760]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Making the small oblique parameters large

    L. Lavoura and L.-F. Li,Making the small oblique parameters large,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 1409 [hep-ph/9309262]. [83]PIONEERcollaboration,European Strategy for Particle Physics Update – PIONEER: a next generation rare pion decay experiment,2504.06375. – 36 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994