Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 cited by

DESI data indicates a preference for time-evolving dark energy, suggesting the Lambda CDM model may be in the string theory swampland.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 22:32 UTC pith:HFMJ5J3Q

load-bearing objection This is a review summarizing recent DESI hints of evolving dark energy and their possible ties to string swampland ideas, with no new calculations or data. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.10476 v2 pith:HFMJ5J3Q submitted 2026-05-11 astro-ph.CO hep-th

Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

Luis A. Anchordoqui , Dieter Lust This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO hep-th
keywords DESIdark energyswamplandstring theoryLambda CDMbaryon acoustic oscillationsde Sitter vacuacosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how the challenge of stabilizing de Sitter space in string theory implies that constant dark energy models may be inconsistent with quantum gravity. DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data, when combined with other surveys, shows a roughly 10 percent reduction in dark energy density over recent cosmic history, favoring a dynamic dark energy instead. This review links these observations to string-inspired scenarios that can accommodate evolving dark energy. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a way to reconcile cosmological observations with fundamental theory by moving away from the standard model.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Lambda cold dark matter model with constant dark energy resides in the swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories because stable de Sitter vacua are difficult to construct in string theory. Recent DESI measurements combined with other cosmological surveys indicate a preference for dynamic dark energy with a time-varying density, approximately 10% lower now than several billion years ago. This opens the possibility for consistent string theory vacua that match observations through evolving dark energy components.

What carries the argument

The de Sitter swampland conjecture, which posits that stable de Sitter vacua cannot exist in consistent string theory compactifications.

Load-bearing premise

The reported preference for evolving dark energy in DESI data is correctly interpreted as physical rather than due to unaccounted systematics or statistical fluctuations.

What would settle it

A future cosmological survey that confirms a constant dark energy density to high precision or finds no evidence for evolution would falsify the claim that Lambda CDM is in the swampland based on these observations.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper reviews recent observational results from DESI BAO measurements combined with other cosmological surveys, which appear to favor a time-evolving dark energy density (roughly 10% reduction over the last several billion years) over a constant Lambda. It argues that this preference places the concordance LambdaCDM model in the string theory swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories and summarizes advancements over the past two years linking these findings to string-inspired dynamical dark energy scenarios.

Significance. If the DESI preference for w(z) ≠ -1 is robust after systematics and can be shown to correspond to a string-consistent quintessence or other non-constant vacuum without extra fine-tuning, the synthesis would provide a useful compilation connecting observational cosmology to de Sitter swampland conjectures. As a review that performs no new analysis, verification, or quantitative mapping, its significance is primarily as a literature summary rather than an original contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central narrative that DESI data places LambdaCDM in the swampland rests on the reported ~10% density reduction being both statistically robust and directly implying a string-consistent dynamical vacuum. The manuscript provides no independent verification, significance calculation, or discussion of systematics/alternative explanations (e.g., modified gravity or statistical fluctuation), leaving the load-bearing step from observation to swampland resolution unaddressed.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No explicit mapping is given between the observed w(z) evolution and any specific string theory construction (e.g., a quintessence potential or non-constant vacuum) that would evade the de Sitter swampland conjectures; the link is asserted rather than derived or cited with quantitative detail.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed comments on our review manuscript. As a literature synthesis rather than an original analysis paper, our aim is to compile and connect recent DESI-related results to string theory swampland discussions. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to improve clarity and context.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central narrative that DESI data places LambdaCDM in the swampland rests on the reported ~10% density reduction being both statistically robust and directly implying a string-consistent dynamical vacuum. The manuscript provides no independent verification, significance calculation, or discussion of systematics/alternative explanations (e.g., modified gravity or statistical fluctuation), leaving the load-bearing step from observation to swampland resolution unaddressed.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript, being a review, contains no new verification, significance calculations, or original analysis of the DESI BAO data. The narrative draws directly from published results in the DESI papers and follow-up literature. To strengthen the presentation, we will revise the abstract and add a short subsection (or expanded introduction paragraph) that summarizes key references addressing systematics, possible statistical fluctuations, and alternative explanations such as modified gravity. This provides readers with context on the robustness without changing the review's scope. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No explicit mapping is given between the observed w(z) evolution and any specific string theory construction (e.g., a quintessence potential or non-constant vacuum) that would evade the de Sitter swampland conjectures; the link is asserted rather than derived or cited with quantitative detail.

    Authors: The abstract and manuscript summarize advancements reported in the cited literature over the past two years, where such mappings are explored. The links are not newly asserted here but drawn from those works. We will revise the abstract to include more explicit references to specific papers providing quantitative examples (e.g., quintessence potentials or non-constant vacua consistent with the observed w(z) and swampland conjectures) and ensure the main text highlights quantitative aspects from those citations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review summarizes external DESI data and string theory literature without internal circular derivations

full rationale

The paper is a review that cites DESI BAO measurements and other cosmological surveys as external inputs indicating a preference for evolving dark energy, then summarizes prior literature linking this to string-inspired scenarios. No derivation chain exists that reduces any claim to a quantity defined by the paper's own fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatz. The central interpretation (Lambda CDM in the swampland) is presented as a consequence of the cited external results rather than an internal construction. This is the expected non-circular outcome for a summary review.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review article; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the manuscript itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5671 in / 1140 out tokens · 29561 ms · 2026-06-30T22:32:44.288794+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The persistent challenge of creating stable de Sitter vacua within string theory undermines the observational validity of the $\Lambda$ cold dark matter (CDM) model. This difficulty suggests that the concordance model of cosmology, characterized by a constant dark energy $\Lambda$, may reside in the swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories rather than the string landscape of consistent ones. Recent observational data, particularly from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), have significantly challenged $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Specifically, the combination of DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements with cosmological surveys seem to indicate a preference for a dynamic, time-evolving dark energy rather than a constant, with roughly 10\% reduction in density over the last several billion years. This review summarizes significant advancements made over the past two years in linking DESI findings to string-inspired scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10476 by Dieter Lust, Luis A. Anchordoqui.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Modular invariant potential (91) in the s-a plane (left) and along the axionic direction for s = 1 (right). At a = 0 and s = 1 the potential has a minimum which persists for s ≥ 1. 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Modular Invariant S-dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Modular invariant potential (104) in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the S-dual (orange) and modular-invariant (blue) potentials in the s (left) and ϕ (right) coordinates. is at the self-dual point. With the minimum persisting at the self-dual point ∀s ≥ 1, the axion a is effectively frozen at the potential’s minimum. The modular invariant potential shares key characteristics with the S-dual potential (83) at both the self-dual point and in the large-s limit. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the S-dual (orange) and modular-invariant (blue) potentials in the s (left) and ϕ (right) coordinates. with the dark dimension scenario. These quintessence scenarios can be described by a two￾dimensional moduli space involving two scalar fields, R and s. In the simplest case, the scalar potential factorizes into two terms, V (R, s) = Λ(R)V (s), (106) where R (located at the boundary) determin… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the target exponential function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Absolute error over the interval x ∈ [0.3, 0.7] (left) and in the extended region (right). The absolute error shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_5.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing Two Dark Dimensions through Primordial Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, and Colliders

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the two-dark-dimensions framework, memory-burden-suppressed primordial black holes can comprise all dark matter from 10^{-3} g to 10^{21} g and generate stochastic gravitational waves detectable by LISA, DECIGO, an...

  2. Phantom-Divide Crossing in Exponentially Coupled Quintessence and the Role of Neutrino-Mass Freedom

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In the CQ-EXP model, fixed neutrino mass yields >3σ preference for β<0 and phantom crossing; freeing ∑mν,eff erases the distinction from w0waCDM.

  3. Cosmological history after higher dimensional inflation

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes a post-inflation cosmological evolution in large-extra-dimension models that prevents bulk graviton overproduction up to reheating while preserving scale-invariant perturbations for 1-2 micron-sized dimensions.

  4. Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Review of DESI evidence for dynamical dark energy, its dependence on parametrization and datasets, and alternative beyond-LambdaCDM interpretations that may address cosmological tensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

296 extracted references · 293 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 121 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    •Lower boundc 1 = 0.62→RMSE≈0.0219

    Inside the fitted interval, i.e.x∈[0.3,0.7], •Nominal casec 1 = 0.81→RMSE≈0.0016. •Lower boundc 1 = 0.62→RMSE≈0.0219. •Upper boundc 1 = 1.00→RMSE≈0.0163

  2. [2]

    error ballooning

    Outside in the extended interval, i.e.x∈[0.0,1.2], •Nominal casec 1 = 0.81→RMSE≈0.0435. •Lower boundc 1 = 0.62→RMSE≈0.0521. 48 •Upper boundc 1 = 1.00→RMSE≈0.0684. Note that the RMSE increases by over 25 times when moving from the fitted interval to the extended interval. This jump perfectly quantifies the visual “error ballooning” driven by the mismatch nearx= 0

  3. [3]

    A. G. Riesset al.[Supernova Search Team], Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009-1038 (1998) doi:10.1086/300499 [arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  4. [4]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutteret al.[Supernova Cosmology Project], Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J.517, 565-586 (1999) doi:10.1086/307221 [arXiv:astro- ph/9812133 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  5. [5]

    Efstathiou, W

    G. Efstathiou, W. J. Sutherland and S. J. Maddox, The cosmological constant and cold dark matter, Nature348, 705-707 (1990) doi:10.1038/348705a0

    work page doi:10.1038/348705a0 1990

  6. [6]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    G. Hinshawet al.[WMAP], Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013) doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 [arXiv:1212.5226 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  7. [7]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results VI: Cosmological parameters, Astron. As- trophys.641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004- 2018

  8. [8]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], DESI DR2 results II: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscilla- tions and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083515 (2025) doi:10.1103/tr6y- kpc6 [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/tr6y- 2025

  9. [9]

    M. A. Sabogal and R. C. Nunes, Robust evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI galaxy-CMB lensing cross-correlation and geometric probes, JCAP09, 084 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/084 [arXiv:2505.24465 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/084 2025

  10. [10]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.[DES], Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1% measurement of the angular bary- onic acoustic oscillation scale at redshift zeff=0.85 from the final dataset, Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 063515 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063515 [arXiv:2402.10696 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.063515 2024

  11. [11]

    Persistent and serious challenge to the Λ CDM throne: Evidence for dynamical dark energy rising from combinations of different types of datasets

    M. Ishak and L. Medina-Varela, Persistent and serious challenge to the ΛCDM throne: Ev- idence for dynamical dark energy rising from combinations of different types of datasets, 49 [arXiv:2507.22856 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant, Astrophys. J. Lett.325, L17 (1988) doi:10.1086/185100

    work page doi:10.1086/185100 1988

  13. [13]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 1988

  14. [14]

    The cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time-dependent cosmological ``constant''

    C. Wetterich, The Cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time dependent cosmolog- ical ’constant’, Astron. Astrophys.301, 321-328 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9408025 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  15. [15]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1582-1585 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582 [arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582 1998

  16. [16]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti, The swampland: introduction and review, Fortsch. Phys.67, no.6, 1900037 (2019) doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 [arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 2019

  18. [18]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swampland Program in string compactifications, Phys. Rept.989, 1-50 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 [arXiv:2102.01111 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 2022

  19. [19]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez, The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics, Universe7, no.8, 273 (2021) doi:10.3390/universe7080273 [arXiv:2107.00087 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7080273 2021

  20. [20]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, Landscape, Swampland, and Extra Dimen- sions, PoSCORFU2023, 215 (2024) doi:10.22323/1.463.0215 [arXiv:2405.04427 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.463.0215 2024

  22. [22]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753-1936 (2006) doi:10.1142/S021827180600942X [arXiv:hep-th/0603057 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x 1936

  23. [23]

    Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

    D. Andriot, Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review, [arXiv:2603.25797 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Annalen der Physik , year = 1916, month = jan, volume =

    A. Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity, Annalen Phys.49, no.7, 769-822 (1916) doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702 1916

  25. [25]

    Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1917, 142-152 (1917) 50

    1917

  26. [26]

    U ber die Kr \

    A. Friedmann, On the Curvature of space, Z. Phys.10, 377-386 (1922) doi:10.1007/BF01332580

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01332580 1922

  27. [27]

    U ber die M \

    A. Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z. Phys.21, 326-332 (1924) doi:10.1007/BF01328280

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01328280 1924

  28. [28]

    Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A47, 49-59 (1927) doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3 1927

  29. [29]

    H. P. Robertson, Kinematics and World-Structure, Astrophys. J.82, 284-301 (1935) doi:10.1086/143681

    work page doi:10.1086/143681 1935

  30. [30]

    A. G. Walker, On Milne’s Theory of World-Structure, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-42, no.1, 90-127 (1937) doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90

    work page doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90 1937

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =

    E. Hubble, A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA1929,15, 168–173. doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

  32. [32]

    Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 030001 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.03 0001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.03 2024

  33. [33]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10, 213-224 (2001) doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 2001

  34. [34]

    E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 2003

  35. [35]

    D. H. Weinberg, M. J. Mortonson, D. J. Eisenstein, C. Hirata, A. G. Riess and E. Rozo, Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration, Phys. Rept.530, 87-255 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 [arXiv:1201.2434 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 2013

  36. [36]

    Brieden, H

    S. Brieden, H. Gil-Mar´ ın and L. Verde, A tale of two (or more)h’s, JCAP04, 023 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/023 [arXiv:2212.04522 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/023 2023

  37. [37]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, JCAP04, 012 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 [arXiv:2404.03000 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 2024

  38. [38]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 II: sample definitions, characteristics, and two-point clustering statistics, JCAP07, 017 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/017 [arXiv:2411.12020 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/017 2024

  39. [39]

    D. W. Hogg, Distance measures in cosmology, [arXiv:astro-ph/9905116 [astro-ph]]. 51

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J.538, 473-476 (2000) doi:10.1086/309179 [arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/309179 2000

  41. [41]

    Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP05, 057 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 [arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 2021

  42. [42]

    A. J. Rosset al.[eBOSS], The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectro- scopic Survey: Large-scale structure catalogues for cosmological analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, no.2, 2354-2371 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 [arXiv:2007.09000 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 2020

  43. [43]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP02, 021 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 [arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024

  44. [44]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results V: CMB power spectra and likelihoods, As- tron. Astrophys.641, A5 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 [arXiv:1907.12875 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 2018

  45. [45]

    F. J. Quet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth, Astrophys. J.962, no.2, 112 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 [arXiv:2304.05202 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 2024

  46. [46]

    MacCrannet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis, Astrophys

    N. MacCrannet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis, Astrophys. J.966, no.1, 138 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2610 [arXiv:2304.05196 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2610 2024

  47. [47]

    M. S. Madhavacherilet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravita- tional Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J.962, no.2, 113 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f [arXiv:2304.05203 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f 2024

  48. [48]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis, CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps, JCAP09, 039 (2022) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 [arXiv:2206.07773 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 2022

  49. [49]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938, no.2, 113 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a [arXiv:2112.03863 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a 2022

  50. [50]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Broutet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys. J.938, 52 no.2, 110 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 [arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 2022

  51. [51]

    Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework

    D. Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys. J.986, no.2, 231 (2025) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 [arXiv:2311.12098 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 2025

  52. [52]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.[DES], The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set, Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, no.1, L14 (2024) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f [arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f 2024

  53. [53]

    B. Popovicet al.[DES], The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration, [arXiv:2511.07517 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    T. J. Hoyt, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, S. Perlmutter, A. Cuceu and R. Gupta, Union3.1: Self-consistent Measurements of Host Galaxy Properties for 2000 Type Ia Supernovae, [arXiv:2601.19424 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv 2000

  55. [55]

    Banana Split: Improved Cosmological Constraints with Two Light-Curve-Shape and Color Populations Using Union3.1+UNITY1.8

    D. Rubin, T. Hoyt, G. Aldering and S. Perlmutter, Banana Split: Improved Cosmological Constraints with Two Light-Curve-Shape and Color Populations Using Union3.1+UNITY1.8, [arXiv:2601.19854 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    JCAP , keywords =

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and J. T. Firouzjaee, Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements, JCAP10, 035 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 [arXiv:2407.16689 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 2024

  57. [57]

    Cortˆ es and A

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle, On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.544, L121-L125 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108 [arXiv:2504.15336 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108 2025

  58. [58]

    Shlivko, P

    D. Shlivko, P. J. Steinhardt and C. L. Steinhardt, Optimal parameterizations for observational constraints on thawing dark energy, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/054 [arXiv:2504.02028 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/054 2025

  59. [59]

    T. N. Li, G. H. Du, S. H. Zhou, Y. H. Li, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, Robust evidence for dynamical dark energy in light of DESI DR2 and joint ACT, SPT, and Planck data, Phys. Dark Univ.52, 102254 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102254 [arXiv:2511.22512 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102254 2026

  60. [60]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.[DES], Dark Energy Survey: Implications for cosmological expansion models from the final DES baryon acoustic oscillation and supernova data, Phys. Rev. D 113, no.6, 063530 (2026) doi:10.1103/z2q4-qcdq [arXiv:2503.06712 [astro-ph.CO]]. 53

    work page doi:10.1103/z2q4-qcdq 2026

  61. [61]

    Mena-Fern´ andezet al.[DES], Dark Energy Survey: DESI-Independent Angular BAO Measurement, [arXiv:2601.14864 [astro-ph.CO]]

    J. Mena-Fern´ andezet al.[DES], Dark Energy Survey: DESI-Independent Angular BAO Measurement, [arXiv:2601.14864 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Giar` e, T

    W. Giar` e, T. Mahassen, E. Di Valentino and S. Pan, An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101906 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101906 [arXiv:2502.10264 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101906 2025

  63. [63]

    Giar` e, Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae, Phys

    W. Giar` e, Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae, Phys. Rev. D112, no.2, 023508 (2025) doi:10.1103/ss37- cxhn [arXiv:2409.17074 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/ss37- 2025

  64. [64]

    Shlivko and P

    D. Shlivko and P. J. Steinhardt, Assessing observational constraints on dark energy, Phys. Lett. B855, 138826 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138826 [arXiv:2405.03933 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138826 2024

  65. [65]

    M. L. Abreu and M. S. Turner, DESI Dark Secrets, [arXiv:2502.08876 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    A. J. Shajib and J. A. Frieman, Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast con- straints, Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 063508 (2025) doi:10.1103/kjpb-r698 [arXiv:2502.06929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/kjpb-r698 2025

  67. [67]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 12, 216 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216 [arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)216 2024

  68. [68]

    Loverde and Z

    M. Loverde and Z. J. Weiner, Massive neutrinos and cosmic composition, JCAP12, 048 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/048 [arXiv:2410.00090 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/048 2024

  69. [69]

    Craig, D

    N. Craig, D. Green, J. Meyers and S. Rajendran, Noνs is Good News, JHEP09, 097 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)097 [arXiv:2405.00836 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)097 2024

  70. [70]

    Green and J

    D. Green and J. Meyers, Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D111, no.8, 083507 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507 [arXiv:2407.07878 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083507 2025

  71. [71]

    Elbers, C

    W. Elbers, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, B. Li and S. Pascoli, Negative neutrino masses as a mirage of dark energy, Phys. Rev. D111, no.6, 063534 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063534 [arXiv:2407.10965 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063534 2025

  72. [72]

    J. Q. Jiang, W. Giar` e, S. Gariazzo, M. G. Dainotti, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi, Neutrino cosmology after DESI: tightest mass upper limits, preference for the normal ordering, and tension with terrestrial observations, JCAP01, 153 54 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153 [arXiv:2407.18047 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153 2025

  73. [73]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, D. Marfatia and J. F. Soriano, Massive neutrinos and interacting dark matter look alike through the lens of lensing, Phys. Rev. D113, no.10, 103517 (2026) doi:10.1103/r89c-jtp2 [arXiv:2511.01048 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/r89c-jtp2 2026

  74. [74]

    Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape

    W. Elbers, A. Aviles, H. E. Noriega, D. Chebat, A. Menegas, C. S. Frenk, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Gonzalez, M. Ishak and O. Lahav,et al.Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083513 (2025) doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 [arXiv:2503.14744 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 2025

  75. [75]

    S. P. Ahlenet al.[DESI], Positive Neutrino Masses with DESI DR2 via Matter Conver- sion to Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, no.8, 081003 (2025) doi:10.1103/yb2k-kn7h [arXiv:2504.20338 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/yb2k-kn7h 2025

  76. [76]

    G. H. Du, T. N. Li, P. J. Wu, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, Cosmological Preference for a Positive Neutrino Mass at 2.7σ: A Joint Analysis of DESI DR2, DESY5, and DESY1 Data, [arXiv:2507.16589 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E. V. Linder, S. Zhang and S. Pan, When One-Parameter Dark Energy Makes Neutrinos Physical Again, [arXiv:2603.15422 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Z. J. Weiner, High-redshift physics from the acoustic scale, [arXiv:2603.18131 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Costa, C

    M. Costa, C. Creque-Sarbinowski, O. Simon and Z. J. Weiner, Dark forces suppress structure growth, [arXiv:2510.00098 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Patel, A

    V. Patel, A. Chakraborty and L. Amendola, The prior dependence of the DESI results, [arXiv:2407.06586 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.