pith. sign in

arxiv: 2005.05290 · v2 · pith:OELWAXDPnew · submitted 2020-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.CO

Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

Jesus Torrado , Antony Lewis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO
keywords Bayesian analysisMonte Carlo samplingparameter blockinghierarchical modelscosmological codesPython frameworkposterior explorationcomputational caching
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cobaya automatically detects interdependencies in model pipelines to cache results and block parameters by dependency and cost for faster sampling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Cobaya as a Python framework for Bayesian analysis of models whose internal stages depend on each other in complex ways. It shows that these dependencies can be inspected automatically so that intermediate calculations are cached and parameters are grouped into blocks that are then sorted to reduce how often expensive steps must be repeated. A novel sorting algorithm takes each parameter's individual cost into account when ordering the blocks. This approach lets users run Monte Carlo sampling, maximization, or importance reweighting on hierarchical models without writing extra dependency code. The result matters for fields such as cosmology where pipelines chain together slow Boltzmann solvers and likelihoods, because the same posterior can be explored with far fewer total evaluations.

Core claim

Cobaya exploits interdependencies between different stages of a model pipeline for sampling efficiency: intermediate results are automatically cached, and parameters are grouped in blocks according to their dependencies and optimally sorted, taking into account their individual computational costs, so as to minimize the cost of their variation during sampling, thanks to a novel algorithm.

What carries the argument

A novel algorithm that groups parameters into dependency blocks and then optimally sorts those blocks by computational cost to minimize re-evaluation during sampling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same automatic blocking logic could be applied to optimization or emulation tasks outside Bayesian sampling, such as training surrogate models for expensive simulators.
  • Because the method assumes pipelines with inspectable stages, it may need explicit extensions for fully black-box or dynamically generated models.
  • Integration with graph-based computation frameworks used in machine learning could make the dependency detection even more general.

Load-bearing premise

The internal structure of an arbitrary user-supplied model pipeline can be automatically inspected and exploited for caching and blocking without requiring user-written dependency declarations or custom code.

What would settle it

A concrete test case in which a hidden or non-static dependency exists between pipeline stages that the automatic inspector fails to detect, producing incorrect cached values and therefore a biased or incorrect posterior.

read the original abstract

We present Cobaya, a general-purpose Bayesian analysis code aimed at models with complex internal interdependencies. Without the need for specific code by the user, interdependencies between different stages of a model pipeline are exploited for sampling efficiency: intermediate results are automatically cached, and parameters are grouped in blocks according to their dependencies and optimally sorted, taking into account their individual computational costs, so as to minimize the cost of their variation during sampling, thanks to a novel algorithm. Cobaya allows exploration of posteriors using a range of Monte Carlo samplers, and also has functions for maximization and importance-reweighting of Monte Carlo samples with new priors and likelihoods. Cobaya is written in Python in a modular way that allows for extendability, use of calculations provided by external packages, and dynamical reparameterization without modifying its source. It can exploit hybrid OpenMP/MPI parallelization, and has sub-millisecond overhead per posterior evaluation. Though Cobaya is a general purpose statistical framework, it includes interfaces to a set of cosmological Boltzmann codes and likelihoods (the latter being agnostic with respect to the choice of the former), and automatic installers for external dependencies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Cobaya, a modular Python framework for Bayesian inference on hierarchical physical models. It automatically exploits pipeline interdependencies via intermediate-result caching and a novel algorithm that groups parameters into blocks according to dependencies and sorts them by individual computational cost to minimize variation expenses during sampling. The code supports a range of Monte Carlo samplers, maximization, importance reweighting, hybrid OpenMP/MPI parallelization, dynamical reparameterization, and provides interfaces to cosmological Boltzmann solvers and likelihoods with automatic dependency installers.

Significance. If the implementation matches the description, the work supplies a practical, extensible tool that reduces sampling costs for complex models without requiring users to declare dependencies explicitly. The released code, low-overhead design, and cosmological interfaces constitute verifiable strengths that can improve efficiency and reproducibility in fields such as cosmology.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sub-millisecond overhead claim would be more convincing if accompanied by a brief reference to benchmark timings or a table in the main text.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (or equivalent on the blocking algorithm): a short pseudocode listing or explicit optimality criterion would help readers verify the generality of the automatic inspection for arbitrary pipelines.
  3. Figure captions: ensure all panels include explicit axis labels and units so that the efficiency gains are immediately readable without consulting the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of the manuscript. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the practical value of Cobaya's automatic caching, novel parameter-blocking algorithm, and interfaces to cosmological codes, and we appreciate the recommendation to accept the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper describes a software package and its novel algorithm for automatic dependency inspection, parameter blocking, and caching in Bayesian sampling. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-referential derivations are present; the central claims are implemented in released, inspectable code rather than reduced to inputs by construction. Self-citations are absent from the load-bearing description of the algorithm.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is a software engineering contribution rather than a theoretical derivation. No free parameters are fitted to data, no new physical axioms are introduced, and no invented entities are postulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1098 out tokens · 34480 ms · 2026-05-14T21:53:33.759262+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data-Driven Discovery of a Simple Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy Parametrization

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bayesian reconstruction and exhaustive symbolic regression on CMB, BAO, and supernova data yield the one-parameter dark energy parametrization w(a) = w0 / sqrt(a) that fits observations comparably to CPL and better th...

  2. Late-time reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-parametric reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior on CMB, DESI BAO, supernovae, and DES data yields a 2.8σ hint for coupling and a preference for phantom divide crossing stabilized...

  3. Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DESI DR1 Lyman-alpha data yields Δ²★=0.379±0.032 and n★=-2.309±0.019 at k★=0.009 km⁻¹s and z=3, sharpening N_eff, α_s, and β_s constraints by factors of 1.18-1.90 when combined with other probes.

  4. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2025-03 accept novelty 7.0

    DESI DR2 BAO data exhibits 2.3 sigma tension with CMB in Lambda-CDM but prefers evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) at 3.1 sigma with CMB and 2.8-4.2 sigma when including supernovae.

  5. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    astro-ph.CO 2024-04 accept novelty 7.0

    First-year DESI BAO data are consistent with flat LambdaCDM and, when combined with CMB, show a 2.5-3.9 sigma preference for evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) that strengthens with certain supernova datasets.

  6. HIcosmo: a differentiable JAX-based framework for cosmology inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HIcosmo is a new JAX-based differentiable framework for background cosmology inference that matches Cobaya results while delivering 8.7x CPU and up to 20x GPU speedups.

  7. The 3D clustering of Lyman Alpha Emitters measured with DESI

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DESI LAE clustering measurements give a linear bias of 2.31-2.62 with constraints on radiative transfer effects and halo occupation from correlation functions and power spectra.

  8. Evolving Dark Energy Is Vacuum Energy After All

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A QCD-vacuum-based model of dynamical dark energy fits Planck+ACT+SPT, DESI DR2, and supernova data while reproducing the late-time evolution favored by DESI.

  9. CMBComp: A Simple and Accurate Compressed CMB Likelihood for Dark Energy, Curvature, and Massive Neutrinos

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CMBComp provides 3-4 parameter compressed CMB likelihoods that reproduce full posterior constraints to high precision when combined with DESI BAO data across LambdaCDM extensions.

  10. New Isocurvature Constraints from JWST UV Luminosity Function

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First UVLF-based constraints on model-agnostic isocurvature power spectra for CDM, baryon, neutrino, and dark radiation modes yield consistent 95% credible envelopes over k ~ 0.5-10 Mpc^{-1}.

  11. Axion dark matter from extended misalignment with a constant-$\omega_\phi$ pre-oscillatory phase and dark radiation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extended misalignment for axion-like particles with constant-ω_ϕ pre-oscillation and dark radiation coupling yields data-driven constraints favoring negative ω_ϕ and f_ϕ in [80, 1.5×10^10] TeV but does not ease cosmol...

  12. Axion dark matter from extended misalignment with a constant-$\omega_\phi$ pre-oscillatory phase and dark radiation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The extended misalignment model with constant-ω_φ pre-oscillatory phase and dark radiation coupling is constrained by cosmological data to favor negative ω_φ and f_φ in [80, 1.5×10^10] TeV without resolving H0 or S8 tensions.

  13. Saturation Mechanisms in the Interacting Dark Sector

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nonlinear dark-sector interaction models with a half-saturation sparseness scale are observationally preferred over their linear counterparts at >95% confidence for two of three cases.

  14. Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A Gompertzian reionization model with three nuisance parameters demotes optical depth to a derived quantity, reducing its uncertainty by a factor of three and revealing potential neutrino mass tension in CMB analyses.

  15. Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new quintessence model with non-minimal coupling produces an effective sign-switching interaction that fits current data better than LambdaCDM or w0waCDM and accounts for late-time dark energy weakening without phan...

  16. Observational constraints on Luciano-Saridakis entropic cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First background-level constraints on Luciano-Saridakis entropic cosmology using CC, Pantheon+ with SH0ES, DESI DR2 BAO and compressed Planck data show robust fit, 2sigma exclusion of LambdaCDM, and potential Hubble t...

  17. Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Smooth Transitions with Recent DESI DR2 Observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Sign-switching dark energy with a transition at z_† fits recent DESI DR2, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ data better than ΛCDM while raising the inferred Hubble constant and easing the Hubble tension.

  18. Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    KiDS-Legacy weak lensing plus CMB data yields a 3 sigma deviation in light deflection from GR in a Lambda CDM background, with the signal driven by large-scale CMB lensing amplitudes.

  19. Modeling nonlinear scales for dynamical dark energy cosmologies with COLA

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    COLA-based hybrid emulator reproduces nonlinear power spectrum boosts in w0wa models to <2% error vs EuclidEmulator2 and produces <0.3σ shifts in LSST-like cosmic shear parameter constraints.

  20. Generalized Distributions of Host Dispersion Measures in the Fast Radio Burst Cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generalizing the host galaxy dispersion measure distribution in FRB cosmology with 125 events produces Hubble constant estimates consistent with Planck 2018 and SH0ES while strongly favoring these models over narrow-p...

  21. Probing the limits of cosmological information from the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest 2-point correlation functions

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using idealized synthetic data, knowing the true continuum in Lyα forest auto- and cross-correlations reduces uncertainties on the AP parameter and Ω_m by ~10%, with extension to 240 h^{-1}Mpc scales adding up to ~15%...

  22. Novel geometrical test of cosmological expansion from photometric data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The BNT transform enables a null test for cosmological expansion history from photometric weak lensing data that is independent of the matter power spectrum.

  23. DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0

    DESI DR1 full-shape clustering yields Ω_m = 0.2962 ± 0.0095 and σ_8 = 0.842 ± 0.034 in flat ΛCDM, tightening to H_0 = 68.40 ± 0.27 km/s/Mpc with CMB and DESY3, while favoring w_0 > -1, w_a < 0 and limiting neutrino ma...

  24. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and its Implications for Structure Growth

    astro-ph.CO 2023-04 accept novelty 6.0

    ACT DR6 yields a 2.3% precise CMB lensing power spectrum with A_lens = 1.013 ± 0.023 relative to Planck 2018 Lambda CDM, giving S8 = 0.818 ± 0.022 and no evidence for suppressed structure growth.

  25. meer21cm: an Analysis Pipeline and Comprehensive Toolkit for HI Intensity Mapping

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0

    meer21cm is a publicly available Python toolkit for post-calibration analysis of single-dish HI intensity mapping surveys, achieving percent-level accuracy on simulated MeerKAT data in the k range 0.02-0.2 h/Mpc.

  26. Constraining primordial oscillations and inflationary particle production with Planck, ACT DR6, and DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Using combined CMB and LSS observations, the analysis sets 95% CL upper limits on oscillatory amplitudes at approximately 2% of A_s and a MAP value of 0.034 for the particle production coupling constant, finding no st...

  27. A hidden reionization prior biases cosmological inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No monotonic reionization history fits Planck τ, patchy kSZ from SPT/ACT, and Lyα endpoint; an early ionization phase at z≳12 relaxes ∑mν<0.39 eV and shifts σ8 via As-τ degeneracy.

  28. Late-Time Oscillating Quintessence in Light of DESI

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A late-onset oscillating quintessence model improves the fit to DESI plus supernova and CMB data by Delta chi squared of about 9 over Lambda CDM, driven by background expansion.

  29. Impact of lensing magnification on the power spectrum turnover

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lensing magnification biases the recovered turnover scale k0 by up to 3.6 sigma in high-z mocks, vanishing above z~3.7 for MegaMapper-like surveys and requiring modeling above z~2.9.

  30. Reconciling large-scale Lyman-$\alpha$ correlations with the SCRIPT Semi-numerical Model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SCRIPT semi-numerical mocks reproduce observed z=6 Lyman-alpha correlation lengths once cosmic variance and two rare transmissive sightlines are included, with mean-free-path fluctuations required.

  31. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Probing new signatures of ultralight axions with gravitational lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New upper limits on ultralight axion dark matter fraction (<1.5% at 10^{-26} eV, <9% at 10^{-25} eV at 95% CL) from combined CMB lensing data, plus marginal 2.1σ preference at 10^{-24.5} eV driven by few points.

  32. Reconstructing dark energy with fewer assumptions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bin-wise uncorrelated reconstruction from DESI/SDSS BAO and Pantheon+/Union3.1/DES-Dovekie supernovae yields dark energy density peaking then declining and equation of state oscillating with phantom crossing near z~0....

  33. Compressed Gaussian likelihood for the Planck low-$\ell$ data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A compressed Gaussian likelihood for Planck low-ℓ data is built from SRoll2 via offset log-normal functions for Fisher compatibility and validated against the original via MCMC.

  34. Posterior sampling in the Age of Emulators

    astro-ph.IM 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Compares MH, MALA, HMC, NUTS, and AIES on differentiable likelihood emulators for ΛCDM and sterile-neutrino models, finding MALA and MH competitive in wall time despite NUTS needing fewer samples.

  35. Late-time Quantum Vacuum Decay and its Cosmological Implications

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Phenomenological late-time vacuum-tunneling models are fit to DESI DR2, supernova, and CMB data, allowing up to 50% vacuum-energy drop for z_t < 1 and a preferred z_t ~7 model that converts ~10% dark matter while easi...

  36. Exploring the Dark Sector: Interacting Radiation in Light of Modern Cosmological Probes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New constraints on dark radiation parameters from recent cosmological datasets show the model alleviates the Hubble tension with SH0ES inclusion while remaining consistent with standard expectations without it.

  37. Signatures of Modified Gravity Below $\mathcal{O}(10)$ Mpc in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Modified gravity below O(10) Mpc in a CPL dynamical dark energy background is required to suppress structure growth at low redshifts while satisfying CMB constraints from ISW and lensing.

  38. Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A sign-switching dark energy model (Λ_s CDM) recovers positive effective neutrino masses (0.055 ± 0.050 eV) consistent with oscillation data, unlike ΛCDM which prefers negative values (-0.075 eV), for DESI DR2 + CMB +...

  39. Ultra-light axion constraints from Planck and ACT: the role of nonlinear modelling

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Naive nonlinear modelling of non-cold matter produces an artificial preference for a subdominant ultralight axion dark matter component at m ≈ 10^{-24} eV via a lensing-like enhancement in the CMB power spectrum.

  40. Constraints on the inflationary vacuum and reheating era from NANOGrav

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NANOGrav data favors a blue-tilted tensor spectrum with nt ≈ 2.2, radiation-dominated reheating, and alpha-vacuum states over standard Bunch-Davies, with a frequency-dependent alpha suggested to resolve the blue-tilt tension.

  41. The End of the First Act: Spectral Running, Interacting Dark Radiation, and the Hubble Tension in Light of ACT DR6 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Including spectral running α_s, β_s and self-interacting dark radiation relaxes the ACT DR6 bound on ΔN_eff to <0.58 and lowers the Hubble tension to 2.2σ with three extra parameters.

  42. Cosmological Impact of Redshift-Dependent Type Ia Supernovae Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A phenomenological redshift-dependent SNIa magnitude correction shows no evidence in ΛCDM but is preferred at 4.3σ with dynamical dark energy, reducing Hubble tension to 1.5σ.

  43. SWIM: Stochastic Warm Inflation Module to generate and analyse Warm Inflationary power spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SWIM is a publicly available numerical platform that generates full Warm Inflation scalar power spectra and enables MCMC parameter estimation with CMB data for arbitrary potentials and dissipation forms.

  44. Effective field theory interpretation of ATLAS measurements involving the Higgs boson, electroweak bosons and the top quark

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    A simultaneous fit to multiple ATLAS datasets constrains 48 SMEFT Wilson coefficients and matches subsets to 2HDM and heavy-vector models, finding consistency with the Standard Model.

  45. Model-Independent Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Datasets and Implications for Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Apparent dynamical dark energy signals from SNe Ia with DESI data are consistent with LambdaCDM when accounting for dataset-specific Omega_m inconsistencies rather than requiring evolving dark energy.

  46. FolpsD: combining EFT and phenomenological approaches for joint power spectrum and bispectrum analyses

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    FolpsD combines EFT power spectrum and tree-level bispectrum with damping to enable joint analyses that improve cosmological constraints from DESI-like galaxy mocks by up to 30% on As and omega_cdm while extending the...

  47. Joint Curvature and Growth Rate measurements with Supernova Peculiar Velocities and the CMB

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SN peculiar velocities plus Planck CMB data give joint constraints on σ8, γ, and Ωk, with hints of positive curvature (Ωk ≈ -0.01) at 2-3σ and γ values consistent with GR.

  48. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  49. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Model-independent reconstruction finds 96.7-98.5% probability of phantom crossing if recombination is standard, but early new physics to ease Hubble tension weakens this preference while requiring unrealistically high...

  50. Measuring neutrino mass in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New ACT and DESI data yield model-dependent upper limits on sum of neutrino masses, with holographic dark energy giving the tightest bounds and a consistent preference for degenerate hierarchy.

  51. The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bayesian evidence computation on DESI DR2 plus Planck and supernovae eliminates the frequentist 3.1 sigma preference for w0waCDM over LambdaCDM when using the DES-Dovekie recalibration, yielding ln B = -0.30 favoring ...

  52. Probing Dynamical Dark Energy with Late-Time Data: Evidence, Tensions, and the Limits of the $w_0w_a$CDM Framework

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Evidence for dynamical dark energy in the w0waCDM framework is strongly dataset-dependent, driven by mismatches in low-redshift BAO distance ratios that produce divergent expansion histories and inconsistent Hubble te...

  53. Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The w†VCDM model shows a statistically significant preference for late-time quintessence-phantom crossing dark energy, raises the Hubble constant, and satisfies neutrino mass and Neff constraints from current cosmolog...

  54. Thawing Quintessence: Priors, evidence, and likely trajectories

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian evidence from DESI DR2 BAO, Planck+ACT CMB, and multiple supernova samples favors thawing quintessence over a cosmological constant.

  55. Cosmological and lunar laser ranging constraints on evolving dark energy in a nonminimally coupled curvature-matter gravity model

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nonminimal curvature-matter coupling produces dynamical dark energy consistent with DESI observations and lunar laser ranging equivalence principle constraints.

  56. LISA as a probe of pre-big-bang physics: a nested sampling analysis

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nested sampling analysis indicates LISA could constrain H1, m, sigma_i and beta in the pre-big-bang model to relative uncertainties of about 18 percent under favorable conditions when including foregrounds.

  57. A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bayesian evidence favors a constant dark energy model for DESI plus Planck data and shows that apparent support for evolving dark energy with added supernova data stems from a 2.95 sigma tension between DESI and DES-S...

  58. Probing Dark Energy Microphysics with kSZ Tomography

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Fisher-matrix forecasts for LSST- and CMB-S4-like surveys show kSZ tomography tightens constraints on dark energy parameters w0 and wa by 15% and 32% while assessing detectability of perturbations for different sound speeds.

  59. The implications of inflation for the last ACT

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A parameterized slow-roll model and a new exponential f(R) inflation model are constrained by P-ACT-LB-BK18 data, with the latter aligning to the ACT scalar spectral index preference in both standard and EDE frameworks.

  60. Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Non-minimally coupled quintessence resolves the Planck-DESI Ω_m tension at >3σ while the effective equation of state stays above w=-1 and other tensions on neutrino mass and growth rate are relieved.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 95 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    cobaya-doc mcmc

    (as long as its elements can be serialized in plain text). We show an example in Fig. 2, including specifi- cation of parameter roles and dynamic parameter defini- tion, as well as definition of the likelihood and prior for the simple case where everything is just a basic Python function. Describing complex models and pipelines can take a large amount of inp...

    work page

  2. [2]

    On their way out of the model (i.e

    Parameterization The Parameterization class controls the flow of pa- rameters into and out of the Model, taking into account their roles with respect to different parts of the code. On their way out of the model (i.e. from the point of view of the Sampler), parameters can play three different roles: • Sampled parameters are the ones whose value is to be vari...

    work page

  3. [3]

    They are inter- faced directly from the 1D continuous distributions of scipy.stats3

    Prior Priors for the sampled parameters can be specified in two different ways: • The prior keyword for each parameter defines a separable product of 1D priors. They are inter- faced directly from the 1D continuous distributions of scipy.stats3. In the example in Fig. 2, these are the uniform priors (x,y )∈ (0, 2)2. • Additional, possibly-multi-dimensional p...

    work page

  4. [4]

    lambda x , y : stats . norm . logpdf ( x - y , loc =0 , scale =0.3)

    Likelihood and theory In general there can be multiple theory and likelihood components in a single model, with each theory compo- nent calculating some quantity required as input to the likelihoods or to another theory component. Likelihoods are just a special subclass of a general Theory class that directly return likelihood values. Both inherit a cachi...

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    R. M. Neal, (2005), math.ST/0502099

    work page arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters

    A. Lewis, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103529 (2013), arXiv:1304.4473 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, MN- RAS 450, L61 (2015), arXiv:1502.01856 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, MN- RAS 453, 4384 (2015), arXiv:1506.00171 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    T. E. Oliphant, Computing in Science Engineering 9, 10 (2007)

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Improving the Flexibility and Robustness of Model-Based Derivative-Free Optimization Solvers

    C. Cartis, J. Fiala, B. Marteau, and L. Roberts, arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1804.00154 [math.OC]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without deriva- tives,

    M. J. D. Powell, “The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without deriva- tives,” Tech. Rep. DAMTP 2009/NA06, University of Cambridge (2009), http://www.cityu.edu.hk/rcms/ publications/preprint26.pdf

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, ApJ 538, 473 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology

    C. Howlett, A. Lewis, A. Hall, and A. Challi- nor, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 1204, 027 (2012), arXiv:1201.3654 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    J. Lesgourgues, ArXiv e-prints (2011), arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys. 1107, 034 (2011), arXiv:1104.2933 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach

    A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103511 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0205436 [astro-ph]. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [17]

    Conservative Constraints on Early Cosmology: an illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter inference code

    B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, K. Benabed, and S. Prunet, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2013, 001 (2013), arXiv:1210.7183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    MontePython 3: boosted MCMC sampler and other features

    T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Dark Univ. 24, 100260 (2019), arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation

    J. Zuntz, M. Paterno, E. Jennings, D. Rudd, A. Man- zotti, S. Dodelson, S. Bridle, S. Sehrish, and J. Kowalkowski, Astron. Comput. 12, 45 (2015), arXiv:1409.3409 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    S. K. Lam, A. Pitrou, and S. Seibert, in Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LL VM Compiler Infrastruc- ture in HPC , LLVM ’15 (ACM, New York, NY, USA,

    work page

  21. [21]

    Behnel, R

    S. Behnel, R. Bradshaw, C. Citro, L. Dalcin, D. Selje- botn, and K. Smith, Computing in Science Engineering 13, 31 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    The YAML data serialization standard,

    “The YAML data serialization standard,” https:// yaml.org/

    work page

  23. [23]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953)

    work page 1953

  24. [24]

    Hastings, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970)

    W. Hastings, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970)

    work page 1970

  25. [25]

    Gelman and D

    A. Gelman and D. Rubin, Stat. Sci. 7, 457 (1992), http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/ published/itsim.pdf

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    S. P. Brooks and A. Gelman, J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 7, 434 (1998), http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/ research/published/brooksgelman2.pdf

    work page 1998

  27. [27]

    McKinney, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Sci- ence Conference, edited by S

    W. McKinney, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Sci- ence Conference, edited by S. van der Walt and J. Mill- man (2010) pp. 51 – 56,http://conference.scipy.org/ proceedings/scipy2010/pdfs/mckinney.pdf

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples

    A. Lewis, (2019), https://getdist.readthedocs.io, arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    van der Walt, S

    S. van der Walt, S. C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux, Com- puting in Science Engineering 13, 22 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    R. E. Smith, J. A. Peacock, A. Jenkins, S. D. M. White, C. S. Frenk, F. R. Pearce, P. A. Thomas, G. Efstathiou, and H. M. P. Couchmann (VIRGO Consortium), MN- RAS 341, 1311 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207664 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum

    R. Takahashi, M. Sato, T. Nishimichi, A. Taruya, and M. Oguri, ApJ 761, 152 (2012), arXiv:1208.2701 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    A. Mead, J. Peacock, C. Heymans, S. Joudaki, and A. Heavens, MNRAS 454, 1958 (2015), arXiv:1505.07833 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1958

  33. [34]

    N. E. Chisari et al. (LSST Dark Energy Science), Astro- phys. J. Suppl. 242, 2 (2019), arXiv:1812.05995 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [35]

    The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts

    J. Aguirre et al. (Simons Observatory), JCAP 1902, 056 (2019), arXiv:1808.07445 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  35. [36]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), A&A 641, A8 (2020), arXiv:1807.06210 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [37]

    B. D. Sherwin and M. Schmittfull, Phys. Rev. D 92, 043005 (2015), arXiv:1502.05356 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [38]

    Demonstration of cosmic microwave background delensing using the cosmic infrared background

    P. Larsen, A. Challinor, B. D. Sherwin, and D. Mak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 151102 (2016), arXiv:1607.05733 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [39]

    CMB Delensing Beyond the B Modes

    D. Green, J. Meyers, and A. van Engelen, J. Cosmol- ogy Astropart. Phys. 1712, 005 (2017), arXiv:1609.08143 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [40]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [41]

    Haario, E

    H. Haario, E. Saksman, and J. Tamminen, Bernoulli 7, 223 (2001), http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bj/ 1080222083

    work page 2001

  41. [42]

    Skilling, Bayesian Analysis 1, 833 (2006)

    J. Skilling, Bayesian Analysis 1, 833 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [43]

    Slice Sampling

    R. M. Neal, arXiv e-prints , physics/0009028 (2000), arXiv:physics/0009028 [physics.data-an]. 17 import numpy as np from cobaya . theory import Theory def f e a t u r e _ e n v e l o p e (k , c , w ) : """ R e t u r n s the value of the e n v e l o p e at k . The e n v e l o p e f u n c t i o n a l form is env ( k ) = exp ( - 0 . 5 ( log10 ( k / c ) / w )...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000