Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12241 v1 pith:LRANNPYL submitted 2023-08-23 cs.IR cs.AI

LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task

classification cs.IR cs.AI
keywords llmsrecommendationtasksbenchmarkmodelsresultsllmrecbenchmarking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, the fast development of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has significantly advanced NLP tasks by enhancing the capabilities of conversational models. However, the application of LLMs in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. To bridge this gap, we propose LLMRec, a LLM-based recommender system designed for benchmarking LLMs on various recommendation tasks. Specifically, we benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs, such as ChatGPT, LLaMA, ChatGLM, on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. Furthermore, we investigate the effectiveness of supervised finetuning to improve LLMs' instruction compliance ability. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation. However, they demonstrated comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods in explainability-based tasks. We also conduct qualitative evaluations to further evaluate the quality of contents generated by different models, and the results show that LLMs can truly understand the provided information and generate clearer and more reasonable results. We aspire that this benchmark will serve as an inspiration for researchers to delve deeper into the potential of LLMs in enhancing recommendation performance. Our codes, processed data and benchmark results are available at https://github.com/williamliujl/LLMRec.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Trustworthy Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A systematic review of over 200 studies concludes that LLMs in recommender systems act as a double-edged sword, creating both opportunities and new risks for trustworthiness.

  2. Rethinking Semantic Collaborative Integration: Why Alignment Is Not Enough

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Semantic and collaborative representations show low item-level overlap on sparse data, so global alignment suppresses complementary signals and a shared-plus-private fusion design is needed instead.