Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Enhancing Clinical Evidence Recommendation with Multi-Channel Heterogeneous Learning on Evidence Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.01242 v1 pith:S3FNKS32 submitted 2023-04-03 cs.CL cs.AI

Enhancing Clinical Evidence Recommendation with Multi-Channel Heterogeneous Learning on Evidence Graphs

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords evidenceclinicalproblemsgraphgraphsheterogeneousinformationlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Clinical evidence encompasses the associations and impacts between patients, interventions (such as drugs or physiotherapy), problems, and outcomes. The goal of recommending clinical evidence is to provide medical practitioners with relevant information to support their decision-making processes and to generate new evidence. Our specific task focuses on recommending evidence based on clinical problems. However, the direct connections between certain clinical problems and related evidence are often sparse, creating a challenge of link sparsity. Additionally, to recommend appropriate evidence, it is essential to jointly exploit both topological relationships among evidence and textual information describing them. To address these challenges, we define two knowledge graphs: an Evidence Co-reference Graph and an Evidence Text Graph, to represent the topological and linguistic relations among evidential elements, respectively. We also introduce a multi-channel heterogeneous learning model and a fusional attention mechanism to handle the co-reference-text heterogeneity in evidence recommendation. Our experiments demonstrate that our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on open data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.