Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14420 v2 pith:Q7GNXJV4 submitted 2023-03-25 cs.CV cs.AI

Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preference

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords humanmodelsimagespreferencealignchoicesstablebetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed a rapid growth of deep generative models, with text-to-image models gaining significant attention from the public. However, existing models often generate images that do not align well with human preferences, such as awkward combinations of limbs and facial expressions. To address this issue, we collect a dataset of human choices on generated images from the Stable Foundation Discord channel. Our experiments demonstrate that current evaluation metrics for generative models do not correlate well with human choices. Thus, we train a human preference classifier with the collected dataset and derive a Human Preference Score (HPS) based on the classifier. Using HPS, we propose a simple yet effective method to adapt Stable Diffusion to better align with human preferences. Our experiments show that HPS outperforms CLIP in predicting human choices and has good generalization capability toward images generated from other models. By tuning Stable Diffusion with the guidance of HPS, the adapted model is able to generate images that are more preferred by human users. The project page is available here: https://tgxs002.github.io/align_sd_web/ .

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DRM: Diffusion-based Reward Model With Step-wise Guidance

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DRM turns a pre-trained diffusion model into a step-wise reward model and uses it for dense RL training (Step-wise GRPO) and guided sampling to improve final image quality.

  2. Deepfake Detection Generalization with Diffusion Noise

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ANL uses diffusion noise prediction and attention to regularize deepfake detectors for better generalization to unseen synthesis methods without added inference cost.

  3. DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DanceGRPO applies GRPO to visual generation tasks to achieve stable policy optimization across diffusion models, rectified flows, multiple tasks, and diverse reward models, outperforming prior RL methods.

  4. Any2Any 3D Diffusion Models with Knowledge Transfer: A Radiotherapy Planning Study

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DiffKT3D transfers priors from video diffusion models to 3D radiotherapy dose prediction via modality-specific embeddings and clinically guided RL, reducing voxel MAE from 2.07 to 1.93 and claiming SOTA over the GDP-H...

  5. RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment

    cs.LG 2023-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RAFT aligns generative models by ranking samples with a reward model and fine-tuning only on the top-ranked outputs, reporting gains on reward scores and automated metrics for LLMs and diffusion models.