Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Task Weighting in Meta-learning with Trajectory Optimisation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.01400 v1 pith:A4C7ODYY submitted 2023-01-04 cs.LG cs.AI

Task Weighting in Meta-learning with Trajectory Optimisation

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords meta-learningtasksactionalgorithmmethodsoptimisationproposedtask-weighting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Developing meta-learning algorithms that are un-biased toward a subset of training tasks often requires hand-designed criteria to weight tasks, potentially resulting in sub-optimal solutions. In this paper, we introduce a new principled and fully-automated task-weighting algorithm for meta-learning methods. By considering the weights of tasks within the same mini-batch as an action, and the meta-parameter of interest as the system state, we cast the task-weighting meta-learning problem to a trajectory optimisation and employ the iterative linear quadratic regulator to determine the optimal action or weights of tasks. We theoretically show that the proposed algorithm converges to an $\epsilon_{0}$-stationary point, and empirically demonstrate that the proposed approach out-performs common hand-engineering weighting methods in two few-shot learning benchmarks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Industry Practitioners Perspectives on AI Model Quality: Perceptions, Challenges, and Solutions

    cs.SE 2024-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Industry AI practitioners view model quality through nine attributes with context-dependent priorities, where data imbalance is a key challenge addressed by strategies like active learning, as confirmed by interviews ...