Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Model Cascading: Towards Jointly Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of NLP Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.05528 v1 pith:4KFBPBKN submitted 2022-10-11 cs.CL cs.AI

Model Cascading: Towards Jointly Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of NLP Systems

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords cascadingmodelsefficiencyaccuracypredictionsystemscomputationalimproving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Do all instances need inference through the big models for a correct prediction? Perhaps not; some instances are easy and can be answered correctly by even small capacity models. This provides opportunities for improving the computational efficiency of systems. In this work, we present an explorative study on 'model cascading', a simple technique that utilizes a collection of models of varying capacities to accurately yet efficiently output predictions. Through comprehensive experiments in multiple task settings that differ in the number of models available for cascading (K value), we show that cascading improves both the computational efficiency and the prediction accuracy. For instance, in K=3 setting, cascading saves up to 88.93% computation cost and consistently achieves superior prediction accuracy with an improvement of up to 2.18%. We also study the impact of introducing additional models in the cascade and show that it further increases the efficiency improvements. Finally, we hope that our work will facilitate development of efficient NLP systems making their widespread adoption in real-world applications possible.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Select to Think: Unlocking SLM Potential with Local Sufficiency

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Small language models can achieve near large-model reasoning performance by learning to re-rank their own top-K token predictions after distilling selection from the large model.

  2. DynamicNER: A Dynamic, Multilingual, and Fine-Grained Dataset for LLM-based Named Entity Recognition

    cs.CL 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DynamicNER is a dynamic-categorization multilingual NER dataset with 155 entity types paired with CascadeNER, a two-stage lightweight LLM method claiming higher fine-grained accuracy.

  3. Select to Think: Unlocking SLM Potential with Local Sufficiency

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Select to Think reframes LLM help as ranking among SLM top-K candidates and distills the ranking ability back into the SLM for improved single-pass reasoning.

  4. Optimal Query Allocation in Extractive QA with LLMs: A Learning-to-Defer Framework with Theoretical Guarantees

    cs.CL 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A learning-to-defer framework allocates extractive QA queries to LLM experts with theoretical optimality guarantees, shown to improve reliability and cut overhead on SQuAD and TriviaQA.

  5. Harnessing Multiple Large Language Models: A Survey on LLM Ensemble

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A systematic survey of LLM ensemble methods organized into a taxonomy of ensemble-before-inference, ensemble-during-inference, and ensemble-after-inference stages, with review of benchmarks, applications, and future d...