Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

End-to-End Affordance Learning for Robotic Manipulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.12941 v1 pith:IYY4H4FY submitted 2022-09-26 cs.RO cs.AI

End-to-End Affordance Learning for Robotic Manipulation

classification cs.RO cs.AI
keywords affordancelearningcontactmanipulationmethodstasksdifferenteffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning to manipulate 3D objects in an interactive environment has been a challenging problem in Reinforcement Learning (RL). In particular, it is hard to train a policy that can generalize over objects with different semantic categories, diverse shape geometry and versatile functionality. Recently, the technique of visual affordance has shown great prospects in providing object-centric information priors with effective actionable semantics. As such, an effective policy can be trained to open a door by knowing how to exert force on the handle. However, to learn the affordance, it often requires human-defined action primitives, which limits the range of applicable tasks. In this study, we take advantage of visual affordance by using the contact information generated during the RL training process to predict contact maps of interest. Such contact prediction process then leads to an end-to-end affordance learning framework that can generalize over different types of manipulation tasks. Surprisingly, the effectiveness of such framework holds even under the multi-stage and the multi-agent scenarios. We tested our method on eight types of manipulation tasks. Results showed that our methods outperform baseline algorithms, including visual-based affordance methods and RL methods, by a large margin on the success rate. The demonstration can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/rlafford/.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AffordanceVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model Empowering Action Generation through Affordance-Aware Understanding

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AffordanceVLA proposes a VLA model with affordance-aware modules (Which2Act, Where2Act, How2Act) in a Mixture-of-Transformer trained in three stages to improve robotic manipulation.

  2. PALM: Progress-Aware Policy Learning via Affordance Reasoning for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PALM improves long-horizon robotic manipulation success by distilling affordance representations for object interaction and predicting within-subtask progress in a VLA model.

  3. SENIOR: Efficient Query Selection and Preference-Guided Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.RO 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SENIOR improves feedback efficiency and policy learning speed in PbRL by combining motion-distinction query selection via kernel density estimation with preference-guided intrinsic rewards, showing gains on simulated ...

  4. RelAfford6D: Relational 6D Affordance Graphs for Constraint-Driven Robotic Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RelAfford6D constructs relational 6D affordance graphs from instructions, uses vision foundation models for metric poses, and executes via closed-loop kinematic constraint tracking to achieve claimed superior zero-sho...

  5. CoRe: Combined Rewards with Vision-Language Model Feedback for Preference-Aligned Reinforcement Learning

    cs.RO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CoRe combines VLM-designed formal rewards with VLM-labeled residual rewards to produce preference-aligned policies on robotic manipulation tasks.