REVIEW 2 cited by
Conditional Energy-Based Models for Implicit Policies: The Gap between Theory and Practice
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Conditional Energy-Based Models for Implicit Policies: The Gap between Theory and Practice
read the original abstract
We present our findings in the gap between theory and practice of using conditional energy-based models (EBM) as an implicit representation for behavior-cloned policies. We also clarify several subtle, and potentially confusing, details in previous work in an attempt to help future research in this area. We point out key differences between unconditional and conditional EBMs, and warn that blindly applying training methods for one to the other could lead to undesirable results that do not generalize well. Finally, we emphasize the importance of the Maximum Mutual Information principle as a necessary condition to achieve good generalization in conditional EBMs as implicit models for regression tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion
Diffusion Policy models robot actions as a conditional diffusion process, outperforming prior state-of-the-art methods by 46.9% on average across 12 manipulation tasks from four benchmarks.
-
From Action Labels to Sets: Rethinking Action Supervision for Imitation Learning from Corrective Feedback
CLIC uses set-valued action targets from interactive human corrections instead of pointwise labels to train more robust imitation learning policies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.