Pith. sign in

REVIEW

From Good to Best: Two-Stage Training for Cross-lingual Machine Reading Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.04735 v1 pith:3EXXHPGE submitted 2021-12-09 cs.LG cs.AI

From Good to Best: Two-Stage Training for Cross-lingual Machine Reading Comprehension

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords cross-linguallanguagelanguagesmodeltrainingaccurateansweranswers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cross-lingual Machine Reading Comprehension (xMRC) is challenging due to the lack of training data in low-resource languages. The recent approaches use training data only in a resource-rich language like English to fine-tune large-scale cross-lingual pre-trained language models. Due to the big difference between languages, a model fine-tuned only by a source language may not perform well for target languages. Interestingly, we observe that while the top-1 results predicted by the previous approaches may often fail to hit the ground-truth answers, the correct answers are often contained in the top-k predicted results. Based on this observation, we develop a two-stage approach to enhance the model performance. The first stage targets at recall: we design a hard-learning (HL) algorithm to maximize the likelihood that the top-k predictions contain the accurate answer. The second stage focuses on precision: an answer-aware contrastive learning (AA-CL) mechanism is developed to learn the fine difference between the accurate answer and other candidates. Our extensive experiments show that our model significantly outperforms a series of strong baselines on two cross-lingual MRC benchmark datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.