Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Catalog of LAMOST Variable Sources Based on Time-domain Photometry of ZTF

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.14166 v1 pith:CO73JUOT submitted 2021-11-28 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM

A Catalog of LAMOST Variable Sources Based on Time-domain Photometry of ZTF

classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords variablesourcesourcescataloglamostcatalogsdataidentification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The identification and analysis of different variable sources is a hot issue in astrophysical research. The Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) spectroscopic survey has accumulated massive spectral data but contains no information about variable sources. Although a few related studies present variable source catalogs for the LAMOST, the studies still have a few deficiencies regarding the type and number of variable sources identified. In this study, we presented a statistical modeling approach to identify variable source candidates. We first crossed the Kepler, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) catalogs to obtain light curves data of variable and non-variable sources. The data are then modeled statistically using commonly used variability parameters, respectively. And then, an optimal variable source identification model is determined using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and four credible evaluation indices such as precision, accuracy, recall, and F1score. Based on this identification model, a catalog of LAMOST variable sources (including 631,769 variable source candidates with a probability greater than 95% and so on) is obtained. To validate the correctness of the catalog, we performed a two-by-two cross-comparison with the GAIA catalog and other published variable source catalogs. We achieved the correct rate ranging from 50% to 100%. Among the 123,756 sources cross-matched, our variable source catalog identifies 85,669 with a correct rate of 69%, which indicates that the variable source catalog presented in this study is credible.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.