Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Backup Control Barrier Functions: Formulation and Comparative Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.11332 v1 pith:XKAFSXCB submitted 2021-04-22 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

Backup Control Barrier Functions: Formulation and Comparative Study

classification eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC
keywords backupcontrolinvariantapproachpolicyunderbarrierbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The backup control barrier function (CBF) was recently proposed as a tractable formulation that guarantees the feasibility of the CBF quadratic programming (QP) via an implicitly defined control invariant set. The control invariant set is based on a fixed backup policy and evaluated online by forward integrating the dynamics under the backup policy. This paper is intended as a tutorial of the backup CBF approach and a comparative study to some benchmarks. First, the backup CBF approach is presented step by step with the underlying math explained in detail. Second, we prove that the backup CBF always has a relative degree 1 under mild assumptions. Third, the backup CBF approach is compared with benchmarks such as Hamilton Jacobi PDE and Sum-of-Squares on the computation of control invariant sets, which shows that one can obtain a control invariant set close to the maximum control invariant set under a good backup policy for many practical problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.