Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Joint XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the reflection spectrum of III Zw 2

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.04454 v1 pith:VGHFGJTR submitted 2020-02-11 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Joint XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the reflection spectrum of III Zw 2

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords reflectionx-rayspectraxmm-newtonaccretionblacknustarobservations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Detecting and modelling the reprocessed hard X-ray emission component in the accretion flow, so-called reflection spectrum is a main tool to estimate black hole spins in a wide range of astrophysical black holes regardless of their mass or distance. In this work, we studied the X-ray spectra of the Seyfert I galaxy III Zw 2 using multi-epoch XMM-Newton, NuSTAR and Suzaku observations. The X-ray spectra exhibit a soft-excess below 1 keV and a prominent excess at the location of the broad Fe K{\alpha} line at 6.4 keV. To account for these spectral features, we have fitted the spectra with multiple models including an ionized partially covering absorber and an accretion disk reflection model. To fully resolve the reflection component, we analyzed jointly the XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations taken in 2017 and archival XMM-Newton data from 2000. Assuming the reflection scenario, the resulting model fits support a rapidly spinning black hole (a > 0.98) in this radio-intermediate source. The X-ray spectra in 2000 and 2017 are remarkably similar with the only difference in the reflection fraction, possibly due to a change in the geometry of the accretion flow. However, the Suzaku observation is markedly different, and we suggest this could be an effect of a jet contribution in the X-ray band, which is supported by the elevated radio flux during this observation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.