Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.00582 v4 pith:RUJOJJ7F submitted 2019-12-02 cs.CL

BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English

classification cs.CL
keywords blimpminimalpairsbenchmarkcontrastsenglishlinguisticmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (shortened to BLiMP), a challenge set for evaluating what language models (LMs) know about major grammatical phenomena in English. BLiMP consists of 67 sub-datasets, each containing 1000 minimal pairs isolating specific contrasts in syntax, morphology, or semantics. The data is automatically generated according to expert-crafted grammars, and aggregate human agreement with the labels is 96.4%. We use it to evaluate n-gram, LSTM, and Transformer (GPT-2 and Transformer-XL) LMs. We find that state-of-the-art models identify morphological contrasts reliably, but they struggle with semantic restrictions on the distribution of quantifiers and negative polarity items and subtle syntactic phenomena such as extraction islands.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Natural Ungrokking: Asymmetric Control of Which Rules Survive Pretraining

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    During pretraining, language models exhibit natural ungrokking where learned rules are forgotten based on their support frequency in the corpus, with asymmetric editability of rule survival.

  2. A framework for analyzing concept representations in neural models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new framework shows concept subspaces are not unique, estimator choice affects containment and disentanglement, LEACE works well but generalizes poorly, and HuBERT encodes phone info as contained and disentangled fr...