Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Imperial College London Submission to VATEX Video Captioning Task

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.07482 v1 pith:DMC4EPVR submitted 2019-10-16 cs.CL cs.NE

Imperial College London Submission to VATEX Video Captioning Task

classification cs.CL cs.NE
keywords actionconditioningbaselinecaptioningcollegefeaturefeaturesimperial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes the Imperial College London team's submission to the 2019' VATEX video captioning challenge, where we first explore two sequence-to-sequence models, namely a recurrent (GRU) model and a transformer model, which generate captions from the I3D action features. We then investigate the effect of dropping the encoder and the attention mechanism and instead conditioning the GRU decoder over two different vectorial representations: (i) a max-pooled action feature vector and (ii) the output of a multi-label classifier trained to predict visual entities from the action features. Our baselines achieved scores comparable to the official baseline. Conditioning over entity predictions performed substantially better than conditioning on the max-pooled feature vector, and only marginally worse than the GRU-based sequence-to-sequence baseline.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.