Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.02597 v2 pith:YSYNXCZP submitted 2019-09-05 cs.CL

Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgelicensingmethodsgrammaticalbertcatsexperimentalexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Though state-of-the-art sentence representation models can perform tasks requiring significant knowledge of grammar, it is an open question how best to evaluate their grammatical knowledge. We explore five experimental methods inspired by prior work evaluating pretrained sentence representation models. We use a single linguistic phenomenon, negative polarity item (NPI) licensing in English, as a case study for our experiments. NPIs like "any" are grammatical only if they appear in a licensing environment like negation ("Sue doesn't have any cats" vs. "Sue has any cats"). This phenomenon is challenging because of the variety of NPI licensing environments that exist. We introduce an artificially generated dataset that manipulates key features of NPI licensing for the experiments. We find that BERT has significant knowledge of these features, but its success varies widely across different experimental methods. We conclude that a variety of methods is necessary to reveal all relevant aspects of a model's grammatical knowledge in a given domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language models

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Different types of syntactic agreement recruit overlapping units within LLMs, indicating that agreement forms a meaningful functional category across English, Russian, Chinese, and structurally similar languages.