Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.00277 v2 pith:GC72YH52 submitted 2019-08-31 cs.CL cs.AI

Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoning

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords readingcomprehensioncosmosdatasetmachinequestionscommonsensecontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding narratives requires reading between the lines, which in turn, requires interpreting the likely causes and effects of events, even when they are not mentioned explicitly. In this paper, we introduce Cosmos QA, a large-scale dataset of 35,600 problems that require commonsense-based reading comprehension, formulated as multiple-choice questions. In stark contrast to most existing reading comprehension datasets where the questions focus on factual and literal understanding of the context paragraph, our dataset focuses on reading between the lines over a diverse collection of people's everyday narratives, asking such questions as "what might be the possible reason of ...?", or "what would have happened if ..." that require reasoning beyond the exact text spans in the context. To establish baseline performances on Cosmos QA, we experiment with several state-of-the-art neural architectures for reading comprehension, and also propose a new architecture that improves over the competitive baselines. Experimental results demonstrate a significant gap between machine (68.4%) and human performance (94%), pointing to avenues for future research on commonsense machine comprehension. Dataset, code and leaderboard is publicly available at https://wilburone.github.io/cosmos.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding

    cs.CY 2020-09 accept novelty 8.0

    Introduces the MMLU benchmark of 57 tasks and shows that current models, including GPT-3, achieve low accuracy far below expert level across academic and professional domains.

  2. Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization

    cs.LG 2021-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    Multitask fine-tuning of an encoder-decoder model on prompted datasets produces zero-shot generalization that often beats models up to 16 times larger on standard benchmarks.

  3. Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Chain-of-Verification reduces hallucinations in large language models by drafting responses, planning independent verification questions, answering them separately, and generating a final verified output.

  4. Dive into Ambiguity: A*-Inspired Multi-Agents Commonsense Obfuscation Attack on LLM Prompts

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An A*-inspired multi-agent framework with hierarchical rewriting and a dynamic gamma parameter generates obfuscated prompts that achieve higher LLM attack success rates with fewer attempts than exhaustive search.