REVIEW 2 cited by
When to use parametric models in reinforcement learning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
When to use parametric models in reinforcement learning?
read the original abstract
We examine the question of when and how parametric models are most useful in reinforcement learning. In particular, we look at commonalities and differences between parametric models and experience replay. Replay-based learning algorithms share important traits with model-based approaches, including the ability to plan: to use more computation without additional data to improve predictions and behaviour. We discuss when to expect benefits from either approach, and interpret prior work in this context. We hypothesise that, under suitable conditions, replay-based algorithms should be competitive to or better than model-based algorithms if the model is used only to generate fictional transitions from observed states for an update rule that is otherwise model-free. We validated this hypothesis on Atari 2600 video games. The replay-based algorithm attained state-of-the-art data efficiency, improving over prior results with parametric models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model
MuZero matches or exceeds AlphaZero-level performance in Go, Chess, Shogi and sets a new state of the art on 57 Atari games by learning a model that directly supports planning rather than reconstructing full environme...
-
Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision-Making?
Return-conditional diffusion models for policies outperform offline RL on benchmarks by circumventing dynamic programming and enable constraint or skill composition.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.