Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Data-driven Algorithm Selection and Parameter Tuning: Two Case studies in Optimization and Signal Processing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.13404 v2 pith:Q6WR5SMO submitted 2019-05-31 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

Data-driven Algorithm Selection and Parameter Tuning: Two Case studies in Optimization and Signal Processing

classification cs.LG math.OCstat.ML
keywords optimizationalgorithmslearningmachineeffectiveoutcomesproblemsprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning algorithms typically rely on optimization subroutines and are well-known to provide very effective outcomes for many types of problems. Here, we flip the reliance and ask the reverse question: can machine learning algorithms lead to more effective outcomes for optimization problems? Our goal is to train machine learning methods to automatically improve the performance of optimization and signal processing algorithms. As a proof of concept, we use our approach to improve two popular data processing subroutines in data science: stochastic gradient descent and greedy methods in compressed sensing. We provide experimental results that demonstrate the answer is ``yes'', machine learning algorithms do lead to more effective outcomes for optimization problems, and show the future potential for this research direction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.