Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.10830 v2 pith:MS4HICG7 submitted 2018-11-27 cs.CV cs.CL

From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning

classification cs.CV cs.CL
keywords reasoningcognitioncommonsensehumansrecognitionvisualanswerbeyond
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual understanding goes well beyond object recognition. With one glance at an image, we can effortlessly imagine the world beyond the pixels: for instance, we can infer people's actions, goals, and mental states. While this task is easy for humans, it is tremendously difficult for today's vision systems, requiring higher-order cognition and commonsense reasoning about the world. We formalize this task as Visual Commonsense Reasoning. Given a challenging question about an image, a machine must answer correctly and then provide a rationale justifying its answer. Next, we introduce a new dataset, VCR, consisting of 290k multiple choice QA problems derived from 110k movie scenes. The key recipe for generating non-trivial and high-quality problems at scale is Adversarial Matching, a new approach to transform rich annotations into multiple choice questions with minimal bias. Experimental results show that while humans find VCR easy (over 90% accuracy), state-of-the-art vision models struggle (~45%). To move towards cognition-level understanding, we present a new reasoning engine, Recognition to Cognition Networks (R2C), that models the necessary layered inferences for grounding, contextualization, and reasoning. R2C helps narrow the gap between humans and machines (~65%); still, the challenge is far from solved, and we provide analysis that suggests avenues for future work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Single Rewrite Suffices: Empirical Lessons from Production Skill Description Optimization

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A single LLM rewrite of skill descriptions using false positive and negative cases matches manual optimization performance in production, with most other pipeline components adding little value.

  2. Bridging the Usability Gap: Lessons from Interpreting Studies for Machine Interpreting Design

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Machine interpreting should shift from fidelity metrics to three design priorities—agency, grounding, and experience—drawn from interpreting studies to close the usability gap with human-mediated communication.