Pith. sign in

REVIEW

MOND and the dynamics of NGC1052-DF2

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.04167 v1 pith:IEWAFXSD submitted 2018-04-11 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

MOND and the dynamics of NGC1052-DF2

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords mathrmmonddispersiondwarffieldngc1052-df2sidesigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The dwarf galaxy NGC1052-DF2 has recently been identified as potentially lacking dark matter. If correct, this could be a challenge for MOND, which predicts that low surface brightness galaxies should evince large mass discrepancies. However, the correct prediction of MOND depends on both the internal field of the dwarf and the external field caused by its proximity to the giant elliptical NGC1052. Taking both into consideration under plausible assumptions, we find $\sigma_{\rm MOND} = 13.4^{+4.8}_{-3.7}\;\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$. This is only marginally higher than the claimed 90\% upper limit on the velocity dispersion ($\sigma < 10.5\;\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$), and compares well with the observed root mean square velocity dispersion ($\sigma = 14.3\;\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$). We also discuss a few caveats on both the observational and theoretical side. On the theory side, the internal virialization time in this dwarf may be longer that the time scale of variation of the external field. On the observational side, the paucity of data and their large uncertainties call for further analysis of the velocity dispersion of NGC1052-DF2, to check whether it poses a challenge to MOND or is a success thereof.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.