Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HACS: Human Action Clips and Segments Dataset for Recognition and Temporal Localization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.09374 v3 pith:MNF7DB5V submitted 2017-12-26 cs.CV cs.AI

HACS: Human Action Clips and Segments Dataset for Recognition and Temporal Localization

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords hacsactionclipsdatasetsegmentshumanvideoslocalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a new large-scale dataset for recognition and temporal localization of human actions collected from Web videos. We refer to it as HACS (Human Action Clips and Segments). We leverage both consensus and disagreement among visual classifiers to automatically mine candidate short clips from unlabeled videos, which are subsequently validated by human annotators. The resulting dataset is dubbed HACS Clips. Through a separate process we also collect annotations defining action segment boundaries. This resulting dataset is called HACS Segments. Overall, HACS Clips consists of 1.5M annotated clips sampled from 504K untrimmed videos, and HACS Seg-ments contains 139K action segments densely annotatedin 50K untrimmed videos spanning 200 action categories. HACS Clips contains more labeled examples than any existing video benchmark. This renders our dataset both a large scale action recognition benchmark and an excellent source for spatiotemporal feature learning. In our transferlearning experiments on three target datasets, HACS Clips outperforms Kinetics-600, Moments-In-Time and Sports1Mas a pretraining source. On HACS Segments, we evaluate state-of-the-art methods of action proposal generation and action localization, and highlight the new challenges posed by our dense temporal annotations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning to Deny: Action Denial in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MLLMs drop from over 85% accuracy on action presence to under 50% on matched action-denial videos, exposing a causal verification gap that causal graph prompts partially close.

  2. HumanNet: Scaling Human-centric Video Learning to One Million Hours

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HumanNet is a 1M-hour human-centric video dataset with interaction annotations that enables better vision-language-action model performance than equivalent robot data in a controlled test.