Pith. sign in

REVIEW

General constraints on influential error sources for super-high accuracy star tracker

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1505.03416 v1 pith:3JLDTAOQ submitted 2015-05-12 astro-ph.IM physics.ins-det

General constraints on influential error sources for super-high accuracy star tracker

classification astro-ph.IM physics.ins-det
keywords errorstaraccuracyconstraintssourcestrackergeneralin-orbit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Though in-orbit calibration is adopted to reduce position error of individual star spot down to 0.02pixel on star tracker, little study has been conducted on the accuracy to what extent for some significant error sources which often leads to in-orbit correction inefficiency. This study presents the general theory and estimates of the minimum error constraints, including not only on position but also on intensity and scale of Gaussian shaped profile based on Cramer Rao Lower Bound(CRLB) theory. By imposing those constraints on motion, drift in focal length and so on, margins of in-flight error sources and the final accuracy of star tracker can be analytically determined before launch.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.