Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Large-Nc equivalence and the sign problem at finite baryon density

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1109.6372 v2 pith:TIQWNWCI submitted 2011-09-29 hep-lat hep-th

Large-Nc equivalence and the sign problem at finite baryon density

classification hep-lat hep-th
keywords phasebaryonchemicalproblemtheoriesfinitepotentialsign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

QCD with a finite baryon chemical potential, despite its importance, is not well understood because the standard lattice QCD simulation is not applicable due to the sign problem. Although QCD-like theories which do not suffer from the sign problem have been studied intensively, relation to QCD with a finite baryon chemical potential was not clear. This paper introduces large-$N_c$ equivalences between QCD and various QCD-like theories. These equivalences lead us to a unified viewpoint for QCD with baryon and isospin chemical potentials, $SO(2N_c)$ and $Sp(2N_c)$ gauge theories, QCD with adjoint matters and two-color QCD. In particular QCD with the baryon chemical potential is large-$N_c$ equivalent to its phase quenched version in a certain parameter region, which is relevant for heavy ion collision experiments. All previous simulation results which study the effect of the phase confirm the phase quench approximation is quantitatively good already at Nc=3; it is so good that often two theories give the same value within error. Therefore the phase quenched simulation is the best strategy for the QCD critical point search. At small volume one can study a tiny 1/Nc effect by the phase reweighting; the large-Nc equivalence guarantees that the phase reweighing method works without suffering from the overlapping problem.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.