Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Thinking Fast and Right: Balancing Accuracy and Reasoning Length with Adaptive Rewards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.18298 v1 pith:OQFWU423 submitted 2025-05-23 cs.CL

Thinking Fast and Right: Balancing Accuracy and Reasoning Length with Adaptive Rewards

classification cs.CL
keywords lengthreasoningaccuracyadaptivemodelspenaltyrewardwhile
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning abilities in mathematical tasks, often enhanced through reinforcement learning (RL). However, RL-trained models frequently produce unnecessarily long reasoning traces -- even for simple queries -- leading to increased inference costs and latency. While recent approaches attempt to control verbosity by adding length penalties to the reward function, these methods rely on fixed penalty terms that are hard to tune and cannot adapt as the model's reasoning capability evolves, limiting their effectiveness. In this work, we propose an adaptive reward-shaping method that enables LLMs to "think fast and right" -- producing concise outputs without sacrificing correctness. Our method dynamically adjusts the reward trade-off between accuracy and response length based on model performance: when accuracy is high, the length penalty increases to encourage faster length reduction; when accuracy drops, the penalty is relaxed to preserve correctness. This adaptive reward accelerates early-stage length reduction while avoiding over-compression in later stages. Experiments across multiple datasets show that our approach consistently and dramatically reduces reasoning length while largely maintaining accuracy, offering a new direction for cost-efficient adaptive reasoning in large-scale language models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CARE: Competence-Aware Reward Shaping for Adaptive Reasoning Length in Video-MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CARE uses exponential moving average competence estimates to progressively shift RL rewards from exploration-oriented long reasoning to efficiency-oriented concise reasoning in video-MLLMs, with batch normalization an...

  2. CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CLORE augments correct on-policy rollouts by deleting repetitive and irrelevant segments then optimizes with auxiliary DPO to improve accuracy-efficiency trade-off on math benchmarks.

  3. Implicit Compression Regularization: Concise Reasoning via Internal Shorter Distributions in RL Post-Training

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ICR creates a virtual shorter distribution from shortest correct on-policy responses to regularize RL post-training toward concise yet accurate reasoning, improving the accuracy-length Pareto frontier on math and know...

  4. GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization

    cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GDPO decouples per-reward normalization in multi-reward RL to avoid advantage collapse and improve convergence over GRPO on tool-calling, math, and coding tasks.

  5. Beyond Penalizing Mistakes: Stabilizing Efficiency Training in Large Reasoning Models via Adaptive Correct-Only Rewards

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ACOER applies adaptive correct-only efficiency rewards in GRPO to avoid reward collapse, yielding higher accuracy and over 60% fewer tokens on math reasoning benchmarks.