Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

BusterX: MLLM-Powered AI-Generated Video Forgery Detection and Explanation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.12620 v8 pith:VZON726R submitted 2025-05-19 cs.CV

BusterX: MLLM-Powered AI-Generated Video Forgery Detection and Explanation

classification cs.CV
keywords busterxdetectionvideomodelstextbfaccuracyai-generatedbaseline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As generative video models become increasingly realistic, detecting AI-generated videos requires systems that offer both accuracy and interpretability. However, applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to video forensics is currently limited by outdated datasets, simplistic evaluation protocols, and a reliance on black-box classification. To address these issues, we introduce a comprehensive dataset, benchmark, and baseline model for video forgery detection. First, we present \textbf{GenBuster-200K}, a fair dataset of over 200,000 high-quality videos sourced from state-of-the-art generators, featuring diverse real-world scenarios. Second, we propose \textbf{GenBuster-Bench}, a diagnostic benchmark spanning three progressive tracks (In-Domain, Out-of-Domain, and In-the-Wild) to evaluate models across \textit{domain shifts} and \textit{generational shifts}. It also introduces an MLLM-as-a-Judge protocol to assess the quality of the generated forensic explanations. Finally, we develop \textbf{BusterX}, an MLLM baseline with RL training. Instead of direct binary classification, BusterX formulates detection as a visual reasoning task, where the generated reasoning chain serves as detector itself. Experimental results demonstrate that BusterX outperforms several leading MLLMs (e.g., Qwen3.5, Claude-Sonnet-4.6) in both detection accuracy and rationale quality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explainable Forensics of Manipulated Segments in Untrimmed Long Videos

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces TASLE benchmark and MSLoc baseline for temporal localization and explanation of manipulated segments in long videos.

  2. Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision-Language Dual-View Survey

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    AIGC-V detection should be treated as factual fidelity verification and organized by a four-layer vision-language dual-view taxonomy spanning cues, motion, cross-modal consistency, and world-level reasoning.

  3. G2VD: Generalizable AI-Generated Video Detection via Counterfactual Intervention and Causal Disentanglement

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    G2VD reaches over 90% accuracy and ~0.95 AUC on hard GenVidBench cross-domain tests by VAE counterfactual intervention plus dual-branch HSIC disentanglement, using only 10% of training data.

  4. SafeGuard: A Multi-Agent Perception-Reasoning Framework for Social-Risk AI-Generated Video Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SafeGuard bridges low-level forensic perception and high-level semantic reasoning via multi-agent collaboration, lifting accuracy +18.7% on a new social-risk AI-video benchmark.

  5. CoCoVideo: The High-Quality Commercial-Model-Based Contrastive Benchmark for AI-Generated Video Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces a commercial-model contrastive AIGC video dataset and a hybrid contrastive-MLLM detection framework claiming SOTA performance on realistic video forgery detection.

  6. Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Artifact-Bench supplies a three-level artifact taxonomy and three evaluation tasks that show 19 MLLMs perform near or below random on AI-video realism detection and reasoning.

  7. Skyra: AI-Generated Video Detection via Grounded Artifact Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Skyra is an MLLM that detects AI-generated videos by identifying and reasoning over grounded visual artifacts, supported by a new annotated dataset and benchmark.

  8. ReConFuse: Reconstruction-Error Guided Semantic Fusion for AI-Generated Video Detection

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ReConFuse detects AI-generated videos by fusing WF-VAE reconstruction error patterns with multi-frame semantic features via a Mamba-based temporal model.

  9. Omni-Fake: Benchmarking Unified Multimodal Social Media Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Omni-Fake delivers a unified multimodal deepfake benchmark dataset and RL-driven detector that reports gains in accuracy, cross-modal generalization, and explainability over prior baselines.

  10. Watch, Remember, Reason: Human-View Video Understanding with MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    This is a survey that frames video MLLM research via a human-view formulation of perceptual representations, memory states, reasoning traces, and predictions, then reviews methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open problems.