REVIEW 3 cited by
Semantics at an Angle: When Cosine Similarity Works Until It Doesn't
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Semantics at an Angle: When Cosine Similarity Works Until It Doesn't
read the original abstract
Cosine similarity has become a standard metric for comparing embeddings in modern machine learning. Its scale-invariance and alignment with model training objectives have contributed to its widespread adoption. However, recent studies have revealed important limitations, particularly when embedding norms carry meaningful semantic information. This informal article offers a reflective and selective examination of the evolution, strengths, and limitations of cosine similarity. We highlight why it performs well in many settings, where it tends to break down, and how emerging alternatives are beginning to address its blind spots. We hope to offer a mix of conceptual clarity and practical perspective, especially for quantitative scientists who think about embeddings not just as vectors, but as geometric and philosophical objects.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
HistoRAG: Embedding Historical Methodology in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Through Critical Technical Practice
HistoRAG embeds historiographical principles into RAG via temporal windowing, decoupled retrieval, and contestable LLM relevance judgments, evaluated on 102k Der Spiegel articles from 1950-1979.
-
Same Patient, Different Words, Different Diagnosis? Evaluating Semantic Stability in Clinical LLMs
Domain specialization does not consistently improve clinical LLM robustness to meaning-preserving prompt variations, as shown by new sensitivity metrics on DiagnosisQA and MedQA.
-
A Dual Cross-Attention Graph Learning Framework For Multimodal MRI-Based Major Depressive Disorder Detection
Dual cross-attention fusion of sMRI and rs-fMRI data achieves 84.71% accuracy in MDD detection on the REST-meta-MDD dataset, outperforming concatenation on functional atlases.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.