Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MediTOD: An English Dialogue Dataset for Medical History Taking with Comprehensive Annotations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14204 v1 pith:LITGJKSJ submitted 2024-10-18 cs.CL

MediTOD: An English Dialogue Dataset for Medical History Taking with Comprehensive Annotations

classification cs.CL
keywords medicalannotationscomprehensivemeditoddatasetdatasetsdialogueattributes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Medical task-oriented dialogue systems can assist doctors by collecting patient medical history, aiding in diagnosis, or guiding treatment selection, thereby reducing doctor burnout and expanding access to medical services. However, doctor-patient dialogue datasets are not readily available, primarily due to privacy regulations. Moreover, existing datasets lack comprehensive annotations involving medical slots and their different attributes, such as symptoms and their onset, progression, and severity. These comprehensive annotations are crucial for accurate diagnosis. Finally, most existing datasets are non-English, limiting their utility for the larger research community. In response, we introduce MediTOD, a new dataset of doctor-patient dialogues in English for the medical history-taking task. Collaborating with doctors, we devise a questionnaire-based labeling scheme tailored to the medical domain. Then, medical professionals create the dataset with high-quality comprehensive annotations, capturing medical slots and their attributes. We establish benchmarks in supervised and few-shot settings on MediTOD for natural language understanding, policy learning, and natural language generation subtasks, evaluating models from both TOD and biomedical domains. We make MediTOD publicly available for future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MedRealMM: A Real-World Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Online Medical Consultation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A real multimodal Chinese online-consultation benchmark of 5,620 cases finds frontier LLMs below physicians, with safety-sensitive error avoidance as the main gap.

  2. Active Evidence-Seeking and Diagnostic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Multi-turn evidence seeking reduces LLM diagnostic accuracy by 12.75% and supporting-evidence quality by 24.36% versus full-context evaluation in a new OSCE-inspired benchmark across 468 cases and 15 models.

  3. STaR-DRO: Stateful Tsallis Reweighting for Group-Robust Structured Prediction

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    STaR-DRO applies momentum-smoothed Tsallis reweighting to focus learning on hard groups in structured prediction, yielding F1 gains on clinical label extraction.