Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Detecting Fake News Using Machine Learning : A Systematic Literature Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.04458 v1 pith:QIB4HA7C submitted 2021-02-08 cs.CY cs.LG

Detecting Fake News Using Machine Learning : A Systematic Literature Review

classification cs.CY cs.LG
keywords newsfakeplatformsuserslearningmachineclassifiersdetect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Internet is one of the important inventions and a large number of persons are its users. These persons use this for different purposes. There are different social media platforms that are accessible to these users. Any user can make a post or spread the news through the online platforms. These platforms do not verify the users or their posts. So some of the users try to spread fake news through these platforms. These news can be propaganda against an individual, society, organization or political party. A human being is unable to detect all these fake news. So there is a need for machine learning classifiers that can detect these fake news automatically. Use of machine learning classifiers for detecting fake news is described in this systematic literature review.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Triospect: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Robust Statistical AI-Generated Text Detection Against Diverse Attacks

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Triospect combines statistical, content, and expression views to detect AI text more robustly, reporting AUROC gains of 22.3% and 9.1% on two attacked benchmarks across 17 attacks and 17 models.