Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Future

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.04406 v2 pith:CZK6TGR4 submitted 2020-11-09 cs.LG

A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Future

classification cs.LG
keywords lnrllearningdirectionslabelsdeepmethodsmodelsnoisy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Classical machine learning implicitly assumes that labels of the training data are sampled from a clean distribution, which can be too restrictive for real-world scenarios. However, statistical-learning-based methods may not train deep learning models robustly with these noisy labels. Therefore, it is urgent to design Label-Noise Representation Learning (LNRL) methods for robustly training deep models with noisy labels. To fully understand LNRL, we conduct a survey study. We first clarify a formal definition for LNRL from the perspective of machine learning. Then, via the lens of learning theory and empirical study, we figure out why noisy labels affect deep models' performance. Based on the theoretical guidance, we categorize different LNRL methods into three directions. Under this unified taxonomy, we provide a thorough discussion of the pros and cons of different categories. More importantly, we summarize the essential components of robust LNRL, which can spark new directions. Lastly, we propose possible research directions within LNRL, such as new datasets, instance-dependent LNRL, and adversarial LNRL. We also envision potential directions beyond LNRL, such as learning with feature-noise, preference-noise, domain-noise, similarity-noise, graph-noise and demonstration-noise.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Safe-Subspace Pseudo-Label Refinement for Source-Free Graph Domain Adaptation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    S²PLR identifies a safe subspace for reliable pseudo-labels in source-free graph domain adaptation using semantic committee signals and structural contrastive verification, then applies noise-tolerant regularization t...

  2. Intelligence Inertia: Physical Isomorphism and Applications

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Intelligence Inertia models the computational resistance to structural change in neural networks via a heuristic relativistic analogy, yielding a J-shaped cost curve that diverges from classical approximations.

  3. Universal hidden monotonic trend estimation with contrastive learning

    cs.LG 2022-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper proposes contrastive trend estimation (CTE) as a universal method for identifying hidden monotonic trends in any type of temporal data without standard assumptions.

  4. An Adaptive Data cleaning Framework for Noisy Label Detection

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A self-adaptive framework maps image samples to a low-dimensional multi-metric space and applies clustering to separate clean and noisy labels, reporting high recall on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and ImageNet-100 under 5-40% sy...