REVIEW 2 cited by
Disentangling Adaptive Gradient Methods from Learning Rates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Disentangling Adaptive Gradient Methods from Learning Rates
read the original abstract
We investigate several confounding factors in the evaluation of optimization algorithms for deep learning. Primarily, we take a deeper look at how adaptive gradient methods interact with the learning rate schedule, a notoriously difficult-to-tune hyperparameter which has dramatic effects on the convergence and generalization of neural network training. We introduce a "grafting" experiment which decouples an update's magnitude from its direction, finding that many existing beliefs in the literature may have arisen from insufficient isolation of the implicit schedule of step sizes. Alongside this contribution, we present some empirical and theoretical retrospectives on the generalization of adaptive gradient methods, aimed at bringing more clarity to this space.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Spectral Scaling Laws of Muon
Muon momentum matrices show layer-dependent power-law scaling of stabilized singular value quantiles with model size from 77M to 2.8B parameters.
-
FOAM: Frequency and Operator Error-Based Adaptive Damping Method for Reducing Staleness-Oriented Error for Shampoo
FOAM adaptively controls damping and update frequency in Shampoo based on staleness-oriented error approximation to cut wall-clock time while preserving convergence.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.