REVIEW 1 cited by
Pathologies of the KMR prescriptions for unintegrated PDFs: Which prescription should be preferred?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Pathologies of the KMR prescriptions for unintegrated PDFs: Which prescription should be preferred?
read the original abstract
We discuss the different Kimber-Martin-Ryskin (KMR) prescriptions for unintegrated parton distribution functions (uPDFs). We show that the strong-ordering (SO) and the angular-ordering (AO) cut-offs lead to strong discrepancies between the obtained cross sections. While the result obtained with the AO cut-off overestimates the heavy-flavor cross section by about a factor 3, the SO cut-off gives the correct answer. We also solve the issue of the KMR uPDFs definitions mentioned by Golec-Biernat and Sta\'sto, and show that, in the case of the AO cut-off, the KMR uPDFs are ill-defined.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Numerical Study of MRW-Type Unintegrated Double Parton Distribution Functions from Non-Factorized DPDFs
Numerical study of MRW-type unintegrated DPDFs constructed from GS09 non-factorized collinear DPDFs via double DGLAP evolution, comparing DMKMRW, DVO-MRW and matched variants.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.