Testing Neural Program Analyzers
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks have been increasingly used in software engineering and program analysis tasks. They usually take a program and make some predictions about it, e.g., bug prediction. We call these models neural program analyzers. The reliability of neural programs can impact the reliability of the encompassing analyses. In this paper, we describe our ongoing efforts to develop effective techniques for testing neural programs. We discuss the challenges involved in developing such tools and our future plans. In our preliminary experiment on a neural model recently proposed in the literature, we found that the model is very brittle, and simple perturbations in the input can cause the model to make mistakes in its prediction.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HEJ-Robust: A Robustness Benchmark for LLM-Based Automated Program Repair
HEJ-Robust benchmark shows LLM-based program repair models drop over 50% in accuracy when buggy code is rewritten with equivalent syntax.
-
HEJ-Robust: A Robustness Benchmark for LLM-Based Automated Program Repair
LLM-based Java program repair models lose over 50% of their bug-fixing success rate when presented with equivalent but syntactically varied buggy code.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.