pith. sign in

arxiv: 1908.05557 · v2 · pith:72DNKCTMnew · submitted 2019-08-15 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Towards Automated Machine Learning: Evaluation and Comparison of AutoML Approaches and Tools

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords automllearningmachinetoolsautomateddatadifferentengineers
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

There has been considerable growth and interest in industrial applications of machine learning (ML) in recent years. ML engineers, as a consequence, are in high demand across the industry, yet improving the efficiency of ML engineers remains a fundamental challenge. Automated machine learning (AutoML) has emerged as a way to save time and effort on repetitive tasks in ML pipelines, such as data pre-processing, feature engineering, model selection, hyperparameter optimization, and prediction result analysis. In this paper, we investigate the current state of AutoML tools aiming to automate these tasks. We conduct various evaluations of the tools on many datasets, in different data segments, to examine their performance, and compare their advantages and disadvantages on different test cases.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Data

    stat.ML 2020-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AutoGluon-Tabular achieves superior accuracy on tabular classification and regression by multi-layer model ensembling and stacking, outperforming other AutoML frameworks on 50 benchmarks and Kaggle competitions.